These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39387382)
1. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanics Using Brillouin Microscopy in Chinese Adults With Myopia. Cao J; Yu Y; Ma Y; Bao Y; Niu L; Wang X; Zhou X; Zhao J J Refract Surg; 2024 Oct; 40(10):e768-e776. PubMed ID: 39387382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Brillouin microscopy analysis of the crystalline lenses of Chinese adults with myopia. Ma Y; Cao J; Yu Y; Fukuyama T; Bao Y; Ding X; Niu L; Zhou X; Zhao J Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Oct; 262(10):3243-3252. PubMed ID: 38753024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation. Matalia J; Francis M; Tejwani S; Dudeja G; Rajappa N; Sinha Roy A J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):486-93. PubMed ID: 27400081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST. Wang W; He M; He H; Zhang C; Jin H; Zhong X Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Apr; 40(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 27964894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in myopes and emmetropes using the Corvis ST. Lee R; Chang RT; Wong IY; Lai JS; Lee JW; Singh K Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 26893029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal biomechanical properties and potential influencing factors in varying degrees of myopia. Sun Y; Guo Y; Pang R; Peng J; Cao K; Wang N Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20626. PubMed ID: 39232107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-related analysis of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Chinese individuals. Guo Y; Guo LL; Yang W; Tian L; Jie Y Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):21713. PubMed ID: 39289420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corneal biomechanical properties in healthy children measured by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology. He M; Ding H; He H; Zhang C; Liu L; Zhong X BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 May; 17(1):70. PubMed ID: 28514942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of potential impact factors of corneal biomechanics in myopia. Du Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Li T; Wang J; Du Z BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):143. PubMed ID: 37024820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The KERATO Biomechanics Study 1: A Comparative Evaluation Using Brillouin Microscopy and Dynamic Scheimpflug Imaging. Vinciguerra R; Palladino S; Herber R; Romano MR; Vinciguerra P J Refract Surg; 2024 Aug; 40(8):e569-e578. PubMed ID: 39120013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study. Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Roberts CJ; Yekta AA; Danesh Z; Reisdorf S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari HR; Sadeghi J J Refract Surg; 2018 Dec; 34(12):849-856. PubMed ID: 30540368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of Corneal Biomechanical Stiffness With Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry in a Pediatric Population. Matalia J; Francis M; Gogri P; Panmand P; Matalia H; Sinha Roy A Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 28731878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries. Qu Z; Li X; Yuan Y; Wang P; Li Y; Lin S; Lian H; Chen S; Ye Y; Wang J; Wu J; Elsheikh A; Bao F J Refract Surg; 2024 May; 40(5):e344-e352. PubMed ID: 38717086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Cap Thickness on Corneal Curvature and Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE: A Prospective, Contralateral Eye Study. Wu D; Liu C; Li B; Wang D; Fang X J Refract Surg; 2020 Feb; 36(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 32032428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of myopia and astigmatism deepening on the corneal biomechanical parameter stress-strain index in individuals of Chinese ethnicity. Liu Y; Pang C; Ming S; Fan Q Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():1018653. PubMed ID: 36420440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients. Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]