These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3939464)

  • 21. Pins and their relation to cavity resistance form for amalgam.
    Buikema DJ; Mayhew RB; Voss JE; Bales DJ
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Mar; 16(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3857664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of cavity shape for minimal amalgam restorations.
    Robinson PB
    Dent Update; 1985 Jul; 12(6):357-8, 360, 362-4 passim. PubMed ID: 3865846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Pins, indications and technique. Rationale for their use].
    Padros Fradera E
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1978; 26(4):227-44. PubMed ID: 286388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The number and location of threaded pins for optimal resistance and retention in premolar amalgam restorations.
    Harrington WG; Moon PC; Crockett WD
    Va Dent J; 1982 Oct; 59(5):24-31. PubMed ID: 6964007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Possibilities for the restoration of the damaged crowns of permanent teeth].
    Modelska D; Grodzicki A; Chmielowska M; Czepiel A; Kotelnicka E; Lebiecki M
    Czas Stomatol; 1984 Dec; 37(12):971-7. PubMed ID: 6599272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel.
    Abu-Hanna AA; Mjör IA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 15088737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; de Jonge BA; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S; Gernet W; Bötsch H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A matrix solution for severly broken-down teeth.
    Knight JS
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 8690264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pins and intracoronal retentive features for multisurface amalgam restorations.
    Munk MB; Brokaw WC
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(4):320-3. PubMed ID: 2638287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Amalgam reconstruction of posterior destruction].
    Anderlini G
    Attual Dent; 1986 Feb; 2(6):8-9, 11, 13-9. PubMed ID: 3527214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Composite-veneered amalgam restorations.
    Gordon M; Laufer BZ; Metzger Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 3866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Restoration of teeth with subgingival and subosseous fractures.
    Goerig AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Dec; 34(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 1104812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pit-retention of extensive amalgam restorations. Part II--A five-year clinical survey.
    Dannheimer MF
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1985 Jun; 40(6):337, 339. PubMed ID: 3909517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Pin retention with large amalgam restorations].
    Dannheimer MF
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1983 Sep; 38(9):578-9, 583. PubMed ID: 6581587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Shavell HM
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1980 Apr; 8(4):48-55. PubMed ID: 6935206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. New developments in tooth restoration with amalgam.
    Devlin H
    Dent Update; 1993; 20(1):21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 8330660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Self-threading pins and amalgapins compared in resistance form for complex amalgam restorations.
    Davis SP; Summitt JB; Mayhew RB; Hawley RJ
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 6583666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.