These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39399297)

  • 21. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study.
    Krnic Martinic M; Meerpohl JJ; von Elm E; Herrle F; Marusic A; Puljak L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e029704. PubMed ID: 31471441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review.
    Dodd S; Gorst SL; Young A; Lucas SW; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jun; 158():127-133. PubMed ID: 37054902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on surgical endodontics: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set.
    Shah PK; El Karim I; Duncan HF; Nagendrababu V; Chong BS
    Int Endod J; 2022 Aug; 55(8):811-832. PubMed ID: 35553439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014.
    Gates M; Elliott SA; Johnson C; Thomson D; Williams K; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 30285643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported.
    Smith V; Clarke M; Williamson P; Gargon E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25455837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of risk of bias assessments in a sample of intervention systematic reviews, part I: many aspects of conduct and reporting need improvement.
    Kolaski K; Clarke M; Rathnayake D; Romeiser Logan L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111480. PubMed ID: 39047919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gray literature in systematic reviews on population health in the Middle East and North Africa: protocol of an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping.
    Chaabna K; Cheema S; Abraham A; Alrouh H; Mamtani R; Sheikh JI
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(1):94. PubMed ID: 30021616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption.
    Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):104. PubMed ID: 35399051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews.
    Wuytack F; Smith V; Clarke M; Williamson P; Gargon E
    Syst Rev; 2015 May; 4():73. PubMed ID: 25987294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical significance did not affect time to publication in non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a metaepidemiological study.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():25-34. PubMed ID: 31276781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review.
    Meher S; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2014 Sep; 121(10):1188-94; discussion 1195-6. PubMed ID: 24571433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review.
    Sabet TS; Anderson DB; Stubbs PW; Buchbinder R; Terwee CB; Chiarotto A; Gagnier J; Verhagen AP
    Syst Rev; 2022 Nov; 11(1):248. PubMed ID: 36403060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. COS-Speech: protocol to develop a core outcome set for dysarthria after stroke for use in clinical practice and research.
    Mitchell C; Bowen A; Conroy P; Whelan BM; Wallace SJ; Dancer A; Woodward-Nutt K; Kirkham JJ
    Trials; 2023 Jan; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 36698201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the completeness and comparability of outcomes in systematic reviews addressing food security: protocol for a methodological study.
    Durão S; Visser M; Kredo T; Saldanha IJ
    Syst Rev; 2020 Jan; 9(1):9. PubMed ID: 31918757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
    Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In-depth qualitative interviews identified barriers and facilitators that influenced chief investigators' use of core outcome sets in randomised controlled trials.
    Hughes KL; Williamson PR; Young B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():111-120. PubMed ID: 34896233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study.
    Eybye MN; Madsen SD; Schultz ANØ; Nim CG
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2022 Dec; 30(1):57. PubMed ID: 36536437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using behavioral science to increase core outcome set use in trials.
    Matvienko-Sikar K; Hussey S; Mellor K; Byrne M; Clarke M; Kirkham JJ; Kottner J; Quirke F; Saldanha IJ; Smith V; Toomey E; Williamson PR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; 168():111285. PubMed ID: 38382890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies on centralisation of healthcare services.
    Pfisterer-Heise S; Scharfe J; Kugler CM; Shehu E; Wolf T; Mathes T; Pieper D
    BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e068138. PubMed ID: 36944460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.