These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39399457)
1. Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for Patients with Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Surgery by Generation. Kato M; Terai H; Namikawa T; Matsumura A; Hoshino M; Toyoda H; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Tamai K; Sawada Y; Iwamae M; Okamura Y; Kobayashi Y; Nakamura H Spine Surg Relat Res; 2024 Sep; 8(5):518-527. PubMed ID: 39399457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 69():93-96. PubMed ID: 31416735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responsiveness of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in lumbar surgery and its threshold for indicating clinically important differences. Fujimori T; Miwa T; Oda T Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29792993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of reference scores and interquartile ranges for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) in patients with low back pain. Tominaga R; Sekiguchi M; Yonemoto K; Kakuma T; Konno SI J Orthop Sci; 2018 Jul; 23(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 29728303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. Ohtori S; Ito T; Yamashita M; Murata Y; Morinaga T; Hirayama J; Kinoshita T; Ataka H; Koshi T; Sekikawa T; Miyagi M; Tanno T; Suzuki M; Aoki Y; Aihara T; Nakamura S; Yamaguchi K; Tauchi T; Hatakeyama K; Takata K; Sameda H; Ozawa T; Hanaoka E; Suzuki H; Akazawa T; Suseki K; Arai H; Kurokawa M; Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Okamoto Y; Miyagi J; Yamagata M; Toyone T; Takahashi K; J Orthop Sci; 2010 Jan; 15(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 20151256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers. Hashizume H; Konno S; Takeshita K; Fukui M; Takahashi K; Chiba K; Miyamoto M; Matsumoto M; Kasai Y; Kanamori M; Matsunaga S; Hosono N; Kanchiku T; Taneichi H; Tanaka N; Kanayama M; Shimizu T; Kawakami M J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):264-80. PubMed ID: 25687654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk Factors for Poor Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up. Makino T; Kaito T; Fujiwara H; Honda H; Sakai Y; Takenaka S; Yoshikawa H; Yonenobu K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(19):1502-1510. PubMed ID: 28248893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions? Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery of the Japanese orthopedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire score and walking ability following lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Takenaka H; Kamiya M; Sugiura H; Nishihama K; Suzuki J; Hanamura S Eur Spine J; 2024 Jun; 33(6):2222-2233. PubMed ID: 38584242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions? Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry. Power JD; Perruccio AV; Canizares M; McIntosh G; Abraham E; Attabib N; Bailey CS; Charest-Morin R; Dea N; Finkelstein J; Fisher C; Glennie RA; Hall H; Johnson MG; Kelly AM; Kingwell S; Manson N; Nataraj A; Paquet J; Singh S; Soroceanu A; Thomas KC; Weber MH; Rampersaud YR Spine J; 2023 Sep; 23(9):1323-1333. PubMed ID: 37160168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of minimally clinically important differences for JOABPEQ measure after discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Azimi P; Yazdanian T; Benzel EC J Spine Surg; 2018 Mar; 4(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 29732429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review. Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease. Nakarai H; Kato S; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 34699996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes of lumbar diseases specific test in patients who undergo endoscopy-assisted tubular surgery with lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: an analysis using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Komatsu J; Iwabuchi M; Endo T; Fukuda H; Kusano K; Miura T; Sato K; Kaneko K; Shirado O Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 31595359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance. Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Values for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in the general elderly population: A Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry. Uehara M; Takahashi J; Ikegami S; Tokida R; Nishimura H; Sakai N; Kuraishi S; Horiuchi H; Kato H J Orthop Sci; 2021 Sep; 26(5):774-778. PubMed ID: 33309132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who Benefits From Hip Arthroplasty or Knee Arthroplasty? Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Thresholds Predict Meaningful Improvement. Langenberger B; Steinbeck V; Busse R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 May; 482(5):867-881. PubMed ID: 38393816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Tanaka S; Ouchida J; Segi N; Kobayashi K; Ando K; Ishiguro N; Imagama S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Sep; 45(18):E1172-E1178. PubMed ID: 32341307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]