These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39399515)

  • 21. Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study.
    Shauer A; De Vries LJ; Akca F; Palazzolo J; Shurrab M; Lashevsky I; Tiong I; Singh SM; Newman D; Szili-Torok T; Crystal E
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii28-ii32. PubMed ID: 29722855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contact feedback improves 1-year outcomes of remote magnetic navigation-guided ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation.
    Noten AME; Hendriks AA; Yap SC; Mol D; Bhagwandien R; Wijchers S; Kardys I; Khan M; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 315():36-44. PubMed ID: 32413467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Remote magnetic navigation shows superior long-term outcomes in pediatric atrioventricular (nodal) tachycardia ablation compared to manual radiofrequency and cryoablation.
    Noten AME; Kammeraad JAE; Ramdat Misier NL; Wijchers S; van Beynum IM; Dalinghaus M; Krasemann TB; Yap SC; de Groot NMS; Szili-Torok T
    Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc; 2021 Dec; 37():100881. PubMed ID: 34646933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a meta-analysis.
    Wu Y; Li KL; Zheng J; Zhang CY; Liu XY; Cui ZM; Yu ZM; Wang RX; Wang W
    Neth Heart J; 2015 Sep; 23(10):485-490. PubMed ID: 26215291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of remote magnetic navigation ablation and manual ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia after failed manual ablation.
    Kawamura M; Scheinman MM; Tseng ZH; Lee BK; Marcus GM; Badhwar N
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jan; 48(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 27314679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Remote magnetic-guided ablation for three origins of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias with right bundle branch block and superior axis.
    Li X; Shang W; Zhang N; Xie Y; Wei Y; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L; Bao Y; Jin Q
    Clin Cardiol; 2021 Mar; 44(3):379-385. PubMed ID: 33471947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remote Magnetic Navigation: A Focus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.
    Aagaard P; Natale A; Briceno D; Nakagawa H; Mohanty S; Gianni C; Burkhardt JD; DI Biase L
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S38-44. PubMed ID: 26969222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Bengel P; Haarmann H; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Heart Vessels; 2024 May; 39(5):427-437. PubMed ID: 38189924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overcoming Access Challenges to Treat Arrhythmias in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Using Robotic Magnetic-Guided Catheter Ablation.
    Khairy P; Dyrda K; Mondésert B; Aguilar M; Dubuc M; Cadrin-Tourigny J; Guerra PG; Raymond-Paquin A; Rivard L; Tadros R; Talajic M; Thibault B; Macle L; Roy D
    J Clin Med; 2024 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 39336920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual control navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jia K; Jin Q; Liu A; Wu L
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 55():78-86. PubMed ID: 31152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation.
    Elisabeth Noten AM; Kis Z; Akca F; Bhagwandien R; Wijchers S; Yap SC; Szili-Torok T
    J Atr Fibrillation; 2019; 11(5):2108. PubMed ID: 31139295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-ring ablation compared with standard circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using remote magnetic catheter navigation.
    Sohns C; Bergau L; Seegers J; Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Zabel M
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Oct; 41(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 24943245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Catheter Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia With Remote Magnetic Navigation: STOP-VT Multicenter Trial.
    Skoda J; Arya A; Garcia F; Gerstenfeld E; Marchlinski F; Hindricks G; Miller J; Petru J; Sediva L; Sha Q; Janotka M; Chovanec M; Waldauf P; Neuzil P; Reddy VY
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S29-37. PubMed ID: 26969220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    Qian P; De Silva K; Kumar S; Nadri F; Samanta R; Bhaskaran A; Ross D; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper M; Kizana E; Davis L; Denniss AR; Thiagalingam A; Thomas S; Kovoor P
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath.
    Luo Q; Xie Y; Bao Y; Wei Y; Lin C; Zhang N; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L; Jin Q
    Clin Cardiol; 2022 May; 45(5):482-487. PubMed ID: 35195273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.