These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39400104)

  • 1. Artefacts on magnetic resonance imaging with Osia®2 bone conduction hearing aid: A cadaver study.
    Diosi B; Bere Z; Csomor A; Tapai T; Toth Z; Kovacs E; Posta B; Csanady M; Nogradi A; Kincses ZT; Rovo L; Perenyi A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Oct; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 39400104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact Associated With Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implants: Cholesteatoma and Vestibular Schwannoma Surveillance.
    Nassiri AM; Messina SA; Benson JC; Lane JI; McGee KP; Trzasko JD; Carlson ML
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):187-194. PubMed ID: 37582349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metal artefact suppression at 3 T MRI: comparison of MAVRIC-SL with conventional fast spin echo sequences in patients with Hip joint arthroplasty.
    Kretzschmar M; Nardo L; Han MM; Heilmeier U; Sam C; Joseph GB; Koch KM; Krug R; Link TM
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):2403-11. PubMed ID: 25680728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of a surgery and the short-term benefits of a new active bone conduction hearing implant - the Osia®.
    Gawęcki W; Gibasiewicz R; Marszał J; Błaszczyk M; Gawłowska M; Wierzbicka M
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 32713797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A New Active Osseointegrated Implant System in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness.
    Willenborg K; Avallone E; Maier H; Lenarz T; Busch S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 33902037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive subperiosteal pocket technique for Osia 2 system- implantation without fixation.
    Bere Z; Nagy R; Posta B; Perenyi A; Fyrlund H; Jarabin J; Dimak B; Rovo L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39180536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences of radiological artefacts in cochlear implantation in temporal bone and complete head.
    Diogo I; Franke N; Steinbach-Hundt S; Mandapathil M; Weiss R; Werner JA; Güldner C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 23938153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone Conduction Implants: Comparative of Audiometric Results and Quality-of-Life Bonebridge® versus Osia®.
    Lorente-Piera J; Manrique-Huarte R; Patricio de Lima J; Huarte-Irujo A; Manrique M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(5):341-350. PubMed ID: 38377970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging of an equine fracture model containing stainless steel metal implants.
    Pownder SL; Koff MF; Shah PH; Fortier LA; Potter HG
    Equine Vet J; 2016 May; 48(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 25627908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensions of artefacts caused by cochlear and auditory brainstem implants in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Majdani E; Majdani O; Steffens M; Warnecke A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Götz F
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Mar; 21(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 31553273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance, audiological outcomes, and quality of life of the Cochlear Osia ® system.
    Young A; Fechtner L; Brennan C; Rende S; Wazen J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(5):103951. PubMed ID: 37329694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing MRI susceptibility artefacts in implants using additively manufactured porous Ti-6Al-4V structures.
    Carter LN; Addison O; Naji N; Seres P; Wilman AH; Shepherd DET; Grover L; Cox S
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Apr; 107():338-348. PubMed ID: 32119921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Piezoelectric bone conduction hearing implant Osia® - audiological and quality of life benefits.
    Marszał J; Gibasiewicz R; Błaszczyk M; Gawłowska M; Gawęcki W
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2021 Jun; 75(6):11-22. PubMed ID: 35175219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strength.
    Liebl H; Heilmeier U; Lee S; Nardo L; Patsch J; Schuppert C; Han M; Rondak IC; Banerjee S; Koch K; Link TM; Krug R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 41(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 24912802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging.
    Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Heil A; Schwindling FS; Nittka M; Grodzki D; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5104-5112. PubMed ID: 28698944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts.
    Akdogan G; Istanbullu OB
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1163-1174. PubMed ID: 36306073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early Osia® 2 bone conduction hearing implant experience: Nationwide controlled-market release data and single-center outcomes.
    Goldstein MR; Bourn S; Jacob A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102818. PubMed ID: 33166860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR imaging near metallic implants using MAVRIC SL: initial clinical experience at 3T.
    Gutierrez LB; Do BH; Gold GE; Hargreaves BA; Koch KM; Worters PW; Stevens KJ
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 25435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI after Bonebridge implantation: a comparison of two implant generations.
    Utrilla C; Gavilán J; García-Raya P; Calvino M; Lassaletta L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Sep; 278(9):3203-3209. PubMed ID: 32965538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parametric Assessment of the Effect of Cochlear Implant Positioning on Brain MRI Artefacts at 3 T.
    Dewey RS; Dineen RA; Clemence M; Dick O; Bowtell R; Kitterick PT
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10):e1449-e1456. PubMed ID: 34267098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.