These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39402184)
1. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation using different methods in eyes with implantable collamer lenses. Salouti R; Nazarpour-Servak M; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):24006. PubMed ID: 39402184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of implantable collamer Lens V4c on ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation based on Pentacam-AXL and IOLMaster 500. Zhang D; Yang M; Liu Z; Cai H; Chen X; Zhang C BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):421. PubMed ID: 36335303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes of ocular biometry in eyes with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Kayhan B; Coskunseven E J Fr Ophtalmol; 2022 Apr; 45(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 35093264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers. Ang RET; Estolano BL; Luz PHC; Umali MIN; Araneta MMQ; Cruz EM BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 39300358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas based on swept-source OCT biometer in cataract patients with phakic intraocular lens. Zeng Z; Zhu M; Zhang G BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Aug; 24(1):326. PubMed ID: 39103785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Third- and fourth-generation formulas for intraocular lens power calculation before and after phakic intraocular lens insertion in high myopia. Amro M; Chanbour W; Arej N; Jarade E J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 30274844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation between Standard Partial Coherence Interferometry-Based and Scheimpflug-Based Biometers: The Importance of Lens Constant Optimization. Sardari S; Khabazkhoob M; Jafarzadehpur E; Fotouhi A J Curr Ophthalmol; 2023; 35(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 37680291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses. Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Andrade Junior N; Hida WT; Messias AMV; Lyra JM; Silva CAM; Alves MR Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2020; 83(2):141-145. PubMed ID: 32159594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry. Tañá-Sanz P; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Ruiz-Santos M; Montés-Micó R; Ruiz-Mesa R; Tañá-Rivero P Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1219-1234. PubMed ID: 34806515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optical Biometry and IOL Calculation in a Commercially Available Optical Coherence Tomography Device and Comparison With Pentacam AXL. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Bazylczyk N; Wang X; Savini G Am J Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 246():236-241. PubMed ID: 36252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length. Kim JW; Eom Y; Yoon EG; Choi Y; Song JS; Jeong JW; Park SK; Kim HM Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 100(3):e701-e709. PubMed ID: 34378871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer. Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer. Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim NR; Chin HS; Jung JW PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227638. PubMed ID: 31935241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery. Cheng H; Li J; Cheng B; Wu M Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 40(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 32297050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL for IOL power measurement in patients with high myopia. Budiman B; Knoch AMH; Boesoirie SF; Budiman NK; Irfani I; Sugiarti ED; Musa IR Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jul; 72(7):1021-1025. PubMed ID: 38905462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas. Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery. Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes. Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]