These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940307)
1. Social policy considerations in noncoital reproduction. Elias S; Annas GJ JAMA; 1986 Jan; 255(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 3940307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee. Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report. Gillon R Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and new reproductive technologies: an international review of committee statements. Walters L Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S3-9. PubMed ID: 11644029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban. Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(15):28. PubMed ID: 11645522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Australia's frozen 'orphan' embryos: a medical, legal and ethical dilemma. Smith GP J Fam Law; 1985-1986; 24(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 11651812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial reproduction: unrestrictive guidelines for UK. Abel J Nature; 1984 Jun 21-27; 309(5970):662. PubMed ID: 6728026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproductive technology: in Australia, the debate moves to embryo experimentation. Waller L Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S21-2. PubMed ID: 11644025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surrogate motherhood: questions of law and values. Kopytoff BK Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1988; 22(2):205-49. PubMed ID: 11659158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law. Smith GP Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report. Deitch R Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Redefining parenthood and protecting embryos: why we need new laws. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 6500920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'The good of the child'. Warnock M Bioethics; 1987 Apr; 1(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 11649830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Williams HE Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]