These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940392)

  • 1. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
    Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
    Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of digital with film radiographs for the classification of pneumoconiotic pleural abnormalities.
    Larson TC; Holiday DB; Antao VC; Thomas J; Pinheiro G; Kapil V; Franzblau A
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 22098943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
    Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing film and digital radiographs for reliability of pneumoconiosis classifications: a modeling approach.
    Sen A; Lee SY; Gillespie BW; Kazerooni EA; Goodsitt MM; Rosenman KD; Lockey JE; Meyer CA; Petsonk EL; Wang ML; Franzblau A
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20207319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
    van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest imaging with a selenium detector: comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest.
    van Heesewijk HP; Neitzel U; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Feldberg MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Sep; 165(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7645464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Portable chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with laser printed digital film.
    Wong SK; Polunin N; Tan KP
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1998 Mar; 27(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 9663305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
    Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
    Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
    Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Conventional radiology, digital radiology with photostimulable phosphor, laser digitalization of thoracic radiographic films at the bedside. A comparative study].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Guidarelli G; Sartoni Galloni S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 1455031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital processing of film radiographs.
    Sommer FG; Smathers RL; Wheat RL; Alvarez RE; Brody WR; Cassel DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jan; 144(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 3880625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital selenium radiography: a comparison of the picture quality of thoracic images in normal and reduced image formats based on the structural anatomical details].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Kamm KF; Jung G; Dölken W; Wassmer G; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1998 Jul; 169(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9711280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.