339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940392)
21. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital chest radiography.
Hansell DM
Br J Hosp Med; 1993 Jan 20-Feb 2; 49(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 8435672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor.
Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andersson B; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Pettersson H
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 2698744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conversion of teaching file cases from film to digital format: a comparison between use of a diagnostic-quality digitizer and use of a flatbed scanner with transparency adapter.
Bassignani MJ; Bubash-Faust L; Ciambotti J; Moran R; McIlhenny J
Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 12755543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Different pixel pitch and maximum luminance of medical grade displays may result in different evaluations of digital radiography images.
Laffranchi A; Cicero C; Lualdi M; Ciniselli CM; Calareso G; Canestrini S; Greco FG; Alberioli E; Cavatorta C; Guarise A; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Scaramuzza D; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Marchianò A
Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):586-592. PubMed ID: 29671208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital imaging of the chest.
Merritt CR; Matthews CC; Scheinhorn D; Balter S
J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 3916446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low-dose flying spot digital radiography of the chest: sensitivity studies.
Kushner DC; Cleveland RH; Herman TE; McLoud TC; Waltman AC; Shepard JA; Dedrick CG; Kopans DB; Greene RE
Radiology; 1987 Jun; 163(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 3575715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system.
Larson A; Lynch DA; Zeligman B; Harlow C; Vanoni C; Thieme G; Kilcoyne R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9423590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
