These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940392)

  • 21. [Can digital selenium-based radiography in thoracic diagnosis replace the analog x-ray imaging technic?].
    Zähringer M; Krug B; Dölken W; Gossmann A; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 9289041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital chest radiography.
    Hansell DM
    Br J Hosp Med; 1993 Jan 20-Feb 2; 49(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 8435672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andersson B; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Pettersson H
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 2698744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
    Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
    Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conversion of teaching file cases from film to digital format: a comparison between use of a diagnostic-quality digitizer and use of a flatbed scanner with transparency adapter.
    Bassignani MJ; Bubash-Faust L; Ciambotti J; Moran R; McIlhenny J
    Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 12755543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different pixel pitch and maximum luminance of medical grade displays may result in different evaluations of digital radiography images.
    Laffranchi A; Cicero C; Lualdi M; Ciniselli CM; Calareso G; Canestrini S; Greco FG; Alberioli E; Cavatorta C; Guarise A; Pignoli E; Plebani M; Scaramuzza D; Siciliano C; Verderio P; Marchianò A
    Radiol Med; 2018 Aug; 123(8):586-592. PubMed ID: 29671208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital imaging of the chest.
    Merritt CR; Matthews CC; Scheinhorn D; Balter S
    J Thorac Imaging; 1985 Dec; 1(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 3916446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Low-dose flying spot digital radiography of the chest: sensitivity studies.
    Kushner DC; Cleveland RH; Herman TE; McLoud TC; Waltman AC; Shepard JA; Dedrick CG; Kopans DB; Greene RE
    Radiology; 1987 Jun; 163(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 3575715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Imaging properties of digital image-intensifier radiography compared to the conventional x-ray technic for chest pictures].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 2536505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of diagnosis of subtle chest disease and subtle fractures with a teleradiology system.
    Larson A; Lynch DA; Zeligman B; Harlow C; Vanoni C; Thieme G; Kilcoyne R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9423590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.