These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940394)

  • 1. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.
    Chakraborty DP; Breatnach ES; Yester MV; Soto B; Barnes GT; Fraser RG
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridsson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests.
    Kelsey CA; Lane RG; Moseley RD; Mettler FA; Rosenberg RD; Williams AG; Garcia JF; Feldman BS; Boardman RE
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):653-5. PubMed ID: 3704147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
    Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.
    Lams PM; Cocklin ML
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 3940365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H; Pärtan G; Urban M; Krampla W; Ottes F; Hruby W
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH; Winter LH; Chakraborty DP; Schultze Kool LJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications.
    Oestmann JW; Greene R; Rhea JT; Rosenthal H; Koenker RM; Tillotson CL; Pearsen KD; Hill JW; Velaj RH
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jul; 24(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 2753645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images.
    Foley WD; Wilson CR; San Dretto M
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Apr; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 3700043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of a medical high dynamic range display.
    Marchessoux C; de Paepe L; Vanovermeire O; Albani L
    Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4023. PubMed ID: 27370121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
    Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of resolution and noise characteristics of digital radiographic detectors on the detectability of lung nodules.
    Saunders RS; Samei E; Hoeschen C
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1603-13. PubMed ID: 15259665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital chest radiography: should images be presented in negative or positive mode?
    Kheddache S; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE; Denbratt L; Gottfridson B; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 1743194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The use of an asymmetric film-screen combination for the imaging of round pulmonary foci].
    Müller RD; Wähling S; Hirche H; Voss M; Gocke P; Gocke C; Blendl C; Turowski B; Buddenbrock B; John V
    Rofo; 1995 Oct; 163(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 7579214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.