These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39408310)

  • 41. Salient nutrition labels shift peoples' attention to healthy foods and exert more influence on their choices.
    Rramani Q; Krajbich I; Enax L; Brustkern L; Weber B
    Nutr Res; 2020 Aug; 80():106-116. PubMed ID: 32739728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sounds Healthy: Modelling sound-evoked consumer food choice through visual attention.
    Peng-Li D; Mathiesen SL; Chan RCK; Byrne DV; Wang QJ
    Appetite; 2021 Sep; 164():105264. PubMed ID: 33865905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. When mere action versus inaction leads to robust preference change.
    Chen Z; Holland RW; Quandt J; Dijksterhuis A; Veling H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Oct; 117(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30920280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Self-other differences in intertemporal decision making: An eye-tracking investigation.
    Sharma SN; Khan A
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Jul; 102():103356. PubMed ID: 35636353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Risky decision-making after exposure to a food-choice task in excess weight adolescents: Relationships with reward-related impulsivity and hunger.
    Moreno-Padilla M; Fernández-Serrano MJ; Reyes Del Paso GA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202994. PubMed ID: 30142187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The unhealthy = tasty belief is associated with BMI through reduced consumption of vegetables: A cross-national and mediational analysis.
    Briers B; Huh YE; Chan E; Mukhopadhyay A
    Appetite; 2020 Jul; 150():104639. PubMed ID: 32097691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Framing Options as Choice or Opportunity: Does the Frame Influence Decisions?
    Abhyankar P; Summers BA; Velikova G; Bekker HL
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):567-82. PubMed ID: 24732048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of test-retest reliability of a food choice task among healthy individuals.
    Foerde K; Gianini L; Wang Y; Wu P; Shohamy D; Walsh BT; Steinglass JE
    Appetite; 2018 Apr; 123():352-356. PubMed ID: 29331365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Context influences decision-making in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A comparison of traditional and novel choice-impulsivity paradigms.
    Patros CH; Alderson RM; Lea SE; Tarle SJ
    Child Neuropsychol; 2017 Feb; 23(2):242-254. PubMed ID: 26695841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting food choices based on eye-tracking data: Comparisons between real-life and virtual tasks.
    Peng M; Browne H; Cahayadi J; Cakmak Y
    Appetite; 2021 Nov; 166():105477. PubMed ID: 34171409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Who Buys Products with Nutrition and Health Claims? A Purchase Simulation with Eye Tracking on the Influence of Consumers' Nutrition Knowledge and Health Motivation.
    Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Nutrients; 2019 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 31547369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Food Is All Around: How Contexts Create Misbeliefs About the Health-Taste Relationship.
    Kunz S; Haasova S; Pivecka N; Schmidt J; Florack A
    Psychol Sci; 2023 May; 34(5):568-580. PubMed ID: 36952306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?
    Zoltak MJ; Veling H; Chen Z; Holland RW
    Appetite; 2018 May; 124():124-132. PubMed ID: 28627402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.
    Cherkasova MV; Clark L; Barton JJS; Schulzer M; Shafiee M; Kingstone A; Stoessl AJ; Winstanley CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(48):10362-10370. PubMed ID: 30373765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The application of defaults to optimize parents' health-based choices for children.
    Loeb KL; Radnitz C; Keller K; Schwartz MB; Marcus S; Pierson RN; Shannon M; DeLaurentis D
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():368-375. PubMed ID: 28257942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Calorie Labeling Promotes Dietary Self-Control by Shifting the Temporal Dynamics of Health- and Taste-Attribute Integration in Overweight Individuals.
    Lim SL; Penrod MT; Ha OR; Bruce JM; Bruce AS
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Mar; 29(3):447-462. PubMed ID: 29369749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Focusing on Future Consequences Enhances Self-Controlled Dietary Choices.
    Kruse J; Korb FM; Surrey C; Wolfensteller U; Goschke T; Scherbaum S
    Nutrients; 2023 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 38201919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Understanding the influence of physical resources and social supports on primary food providers' snack food provision: a discrete choice experiment.
    Johnson BJ; Golley RK; Zarnowiecki D; Hendrie GA; Huynh EK
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2020 Nov; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 33256737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Nutrition label processing in the past 10 years: Contributions from eye tracking approach.
    Ma G; Zhuang X
    Appetite; 2021 Jan; 156():104859. PubMed ID: 32916209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does my brain want what my eyes like? - How food liking and choice influence spatio-temporal brain dynamics of food viewing.
    Bielser ML; Crézé C; Murray MM; Toepel U
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Dec; 110():64-73. PubMed ID: 26578256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.