106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3940967)
21. Antitrust decision focuses on sufficiency of evidence.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Mar; 7(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 10103987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The cost of maternity care in rural hospitals.
Hein HA; Ferguson NN
JAMA; 1978 Nov; 240(19):2051-2. PubMed ID: 702697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Increasing up-front collections.
Kapel AS; McCormack J; Merkatz IR; Oliva J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Mar; 58(3):82-8. PubMed ID: 15029804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The marketing of obstetrics.
Breindel CL; Breindel JT
Health Care Plann Mark; 1981 Apr; 1(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 10251981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Relating costs to charges: analyzing 3 labor/delivery services.
Mitchell SE; Aderholdt JM
Hosp Financ Manage; 1979 Nov; 33(11):56, 58-61. PubMed ID: 10244283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Coinsurance discounts: one possible solution to illogical pricing.
Lefton R
Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Oct; 61(10):70-2, 74. PubMed ID: 17953185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marketing ensures success of maternity care program.
Lee JM
Hospitals; 1980 Dec; 54(24):91-2, 94. PubMed ID: 7429474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Guaranteeing OB rates to reduce bad debts.
Sheahan ET
Hosp Prog; 1978 Jan; 59(1):52, 54. PubMed ID: 621053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Economic appraisal of in vitro fertilization: discussion paper.
Page H
J R Soc Med; 1989 Feb; 82(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 2494327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of hospital charges generated by certified nurse-midwives' and physicians' clients.
Cherry J; Foster JC
J Nurse Midwifery; 1982; 27(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 6915967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Product line management: financial incentives mean healthier patients.
Lohrmann GM; Smith EG
Healthc Financ Manage; 1988 May; 42(5):58-60, 64. PubMed ID: 10287414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Equipment costs. The neonatal intensive care unit and the modern obstetric unit.
Bajo K
Clin Perinatol; 1983 Feb; 10(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 6851387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A bigger brood. As OB/GYN practices grow nationwide, what's good news for the docs can be bad news for hospitals and health plans.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(43):28-30. PubMed ID: 16276748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Small maternity services.
Klein L
JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1923-4. PubMed ID: 3951121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Economic aspects of intensive care in obstetrics].
Koepcke E; Seidenschnur G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1982; 104(12):719-30. PubMed ID: 6812326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Our hospital's competitive zeal almost buried us.
Copeland LR
Med Econ; 1989 May; 66(10):233, 237, 241. PubMed ID: 10293376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Fetal monitors: hospitals continue use despite adverse reports.
Stoltz MK
Health Care Week; 1979 Jan; 2(28):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10323983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Inspector General's fraud alerts: questionable utility for hospitals and practitioners.
Peregrine MW; Thiel DK
Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 10123463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Exclusive contracts for services: an antitrust risk?
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1983 Mar; 57(5):48. PubMed ID: 6822394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship among cost, quality, and competition: an analysis of obstetrics services in Missouri hospitals.
Skelton AG
J Health Care Finance; 1997; 24(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 9327357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
