These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3941193)
21. Complications of chemical peeling. Resnik SS; Resnik BI Dermatol Clin; 1995 Apr; 13(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 7600707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Present day status of the chemical face peel. Litton C; Szachowicz EH; Trinidad GP Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1986; 10(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3521229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chemical peel for facial wrinkles. Stough DB; Irwin WG Am Fam Physician; 1974 Dec; 10(6):106-8. PubMed ID: 4432798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of dermabrasion, phenol peel, and acetic acid peel. Ersek RA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 1991; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 1897419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Phenol chemosurgery for removal of deep facial wrinkles. Gross BG; Maschek F Int J Dermatol; 1980 Apr; 19(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 7390684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of sandpaper in chemical peeling combined with dermabrasion of the face. Lusthaus S; Benmeir P; Neuman A; Weinberg A; Wexler MR Ann Plast Surg; 1993 Sep; 31(3):281-2. PubMed ID: 8239422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Chemical face peels. Matarasso SL; Glogau RG Dermatol Clin; 1991 Jan; 9(1):131-50. PubMed ID: 2022090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dermabrasion, chemabrasion, and laserabrasion. Historical perspectives, modern dermabrasion techniques, and future trends. Fulton JE Dermatol Surg; 1996 Jul; 22(7):619-28. PubMed ID: 8680784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Universal Trichloroacetic Acid Peel Technique for Light and Dark Skin. Fanous N; Zari S JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 May; 19(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 28097306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Trichloroacetic acid peeling versus dermabrasion: a histometric, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison. El-Domyati MB; Attia SK; Saleh FY; Ahmad HM; Uitto JJ Dermatol Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2 Pt 1):179-88. PubMed ID: 14756647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of chemosurgical peels and dermabrasion on dermal elastic tissue. Giese SY; McKinney P; Roth SI; Zukowski M Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Aug; 100(2):489-98; discussion 499-500. PubMed ID: 9252620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Histological and clinical evaluation of facial resurfacing using a carbon dioxide laser with the computer pattern generator. Rubach BW; Schoenrock LD Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 123(9):929-34. PubMed ID: 9305242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: Part I. Dissecting the formula. Hetter GP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jan; 105(1):227-39; discussion 249-51. PubMed ID: 10626996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combined chemical peeling and dermabrasion for deep acne and posttraumatic scars as well as aging face. Ayhan S; Baran CN; Yavuzer R; Latifoglu O; Cenetoglu S; Baran NK Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Sep; 102(4):1238-46. PubMed ID: 9734451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Test spots in dermabrasion and chemical peeling. Swinehart JM J Dermatol Surg Oncol; 1990 Jun; 16(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 2355135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The chemical peel. Peters W Ann Plast Surg; 1991 Jun; 26(6):564-71. PubMed ID: 1883165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Chemical peels: their place within the range of resurfacing techniques. Fulton JE; Porumb S Am J Clin Dermatol; 2004; 5(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15186197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]