These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39413047)

  • 1. A Comparison of 226- and 1000-Hz Probe Tone Tympanometry With Myringotomy Findings in Infants.
    Gellrich D; Eder K; Echternach M; Gröger M; Huber P
    Am J Audiol; 2024 Dec; 33(4):1246-1256. PubMed ID: 39413047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tympanometry in infants with middle ear effusion having been identified using spiral computerized tomography.
    Zhiqi L; Kun Y; Zhiwu H
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 20015724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 1000 Hz-, 226 Hz-probe tone tympanometry and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the function of middle ear in infants.
    Yang K; Liu Z
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Sep; 136():110135. PubMed ID: 32544643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usefulness of 1000-Hz probe tone in tympanometry according to age in Korean infants.
    Park M; Han KH; Jung H; Kim MH; Chang HK; Kim SH; Park MK; Lee JH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jan; 79(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 25468461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of tympanometry with 226 Hz and 1000 Hz probe tones in children with Down syndrome.
    Lewis MP; Bradford Bell E; Evans AK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1492-5. PubMed ID: 21944057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of 1000 Hz tympanometry in infants: tympanometric trace classification and choice of probe tone in relation to age.
    Hoffmann A; Deuster D; Rosslau K; Knief A; Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A; Schmidt CM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 23726955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative analysis of 226 Hz and 1 000 Hz probe tone tympanometry in infants].
    Xu J; Chen S; Zheng Z; Shao X; Su R; Shen A; Shi B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(7):371-5. PubMed ID: 23833991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison between 226 Hz probe tone tympanometry and spiral CT test in infants].
    Liu Z; Liu L; Yang K
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):887-9. PubMed ID: 23285954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of Multicomponent Tympanometry in Identifying Middle Ear Disorder.
    Raut M; Vanaja CS
    Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 71(Suppl 2):1485-1489. PubMed ID: 31750201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of conductive hearing loss in young infants using tympanometry and wideband reflectance.
    Prieve BA; Vander Werff KR; Preston JL; Georgantas L
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 23263407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of middle ear function in young children: clinical guidelines for the use of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry.
    Alaerts J; Luts H; Wouters J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Sep; 28(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 17948353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of tympanometry results for probe tones of 226 Hz and 1000 Hz in newborns.
    Pilka E; Kochanek K; Jedrzejczak WW; Saczek A; Skarzynski H; Niedzielski A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 147():110804. PubMed ID: 34175657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study.
    Meyer SE; Jardine CA; Deverson W
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 9276101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of trace patterns of 226- and 1000-Hz tympanometry in healthy neonates.
    Son EJ; Park YA; Kim JH; Hong SA; Lim HY; Choi JY; Lee WS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Oct; 39(5):455-60. PubMed ID: 22055507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multifrequency tympanometry in neonatal intensive care unit and well babies.
    Shahnaz N; Miranda T; Polka L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 May; 19(5):392-418. PubMed ID: 19253812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of tympanometry and pneumatic otoscopy for predicting middle ear disease.
    Harris PK; Hutchinson KM; Moravec J
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 16180966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wideband reflectance in Down syndrome.
    Soares JC; Urosas JG; Calarga KS; Pichelli TS; Limongi SC; Shahnaz N; Carvallo RM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 87():164-71. PubMed ID: 27368466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multifrequency tympanometry and histopathology in chinchillas with experimentally produced middle ear pathologies.
    Margolis RH; Schachern PL; Fulton S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Mar; 118(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 9583790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.
    Rosowski JJ; Nakajima HH; Hamade MA; Mahfoud L; Merchant GR; Halpin CF; Merchant SN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 21857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical importance of tympanometry in the diagnosis of chronic secretory otitis].
    Spremo S; Markić Z; Kurbalija
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(7-8):242-7. PubMed ID: 9863390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.