These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3941672)

  • 21. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aneuploidy-inducing chemicals in yeast evaluated by the micronucleus test.
    Basler A
    Mutat Res; 1986 May; 174(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 3517637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the Ames II and traditional Ames test responses with respect to mutagenicity, strain specificities, need for metabolism and correlation with rodent carcinogenicity.
    Kamber M; Flückiger-Isler S; Engelhardt G; Jaeckh R; Zeiger E
    Mutagenesis; 2009 Jul; 24(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 19447896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The clastogenicity of chemicals in cultured mammalian cells.
    Ishidate M; Harnois MC
    Mutagenesis; 1987 May; 2(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 3325752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Aneuploidy induced by cyclophosphamide in developing rat testes.
    Saxena AK; Singh G
    In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim; 1998 Jan; 34(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 9542625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Aneuploidy in mammalian somatic cells in vivo.
    Cimino MC; Tice RR; Liang JC
    Mutat Res; 1986; 167(1-2):107-22. PubMed ID: 3941670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Short-term assays to predict carcinogenicity. Assays for aneuploidy in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Würgler FE; Ramel C; Moustacchi E; Carere A
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (83):395-407. PubMed ID: 3114139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing for mitotic crossing over and induced aneuploidy using Aspergillus nidulans as part of the UKEMS test programme.
    Watkins P
    Mutat Res; 1982; 100(1-4):133-8. PubMed ID: 7035881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bacterial and mammalian mutagenicity tests: validation and comparative studies on 180 chemicals.
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C; Camus AM; Martel-Planche G; Brun G; Hautefeuille A; Sabadie N; Barbin A; Kuroki T; Drevon C; Piccoli C; Montesano R
    IARC Sci Publ; 1980; (27):179-241. PubMed ID: 7002778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aneuploidy studies in mammals.
    Adler ID
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():285-93. PubMed ID: 2203010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated metaphase finding: an assessment of the efficiency of the METAFER2 system in a routine mutagenicity assay.
    Huber R; Kulka U; Lörch T; Braselmann H; Bauchinger M
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 334(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 7528343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immunofluorescent and confocal laser cytometric analyses of centromeres in V79 cells.
    Krishna G; Urda G; Lalwani ND
    Mutat Res; 1995 Apr; 328(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 7898498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detection and characterization of mechanisms of action of aneugenic chemicals.
    Parry EM; Parry JM; Corso C; Doherty A; Haddad F; Hermine TF; Johnson G; Kayani M; Quick E; Warr T; Williamson J
    Mutagenesis; 2002 Nov; 17(6):509-21. PubMed ID: 12435848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The detection and assessment of the aneugenic potential of environmental chemicals: the European Community Aneuploidy Project.
    Parry JM; Sors A
    Mutat Res; 1993 May; 287(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 7683383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perspectives in the use of Drosophila melanogaster in genotoxicity testing.
    Zordan M; Costa R; Levis AG
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 372():423-31. PubMed ID: 1956936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparisons of tests for aneuploidy.
    Parry JM; Parry EM
    Mutat Res; 1987 Dec; 181(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 3317028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vitro and in vivo extrapolations of genotoxin exposures: consideration of factors which influence dose-response thresholds.
    Parry JM; Jenkins GJ; Haddad F; Bourner R; Parry EM
    Mutat Res; 2000 Jan; 464(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 10633177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the SOS chromotest for detection of genotoxic drugs.
    Marczewska J; Chłopkiewicz B; Ejchart A; Koziorowska J
    Acta Microbiol Pol; 1993; 42(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 7509561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chemically-induced aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes.
    Mailhes JB; Marchetti F
    Mutat Res; 1994 Jan; 320(1-2):87-111. PubMed ID: 7506390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of a human X mouse hybrid cell line to detect aneuploidy induced by environmental chemicals.
    Athwal RS; Sandhu SS
    Mutat Res; 1985 Mar; 149(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 3974624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.