These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 39418862)
1. Energy and environmental assessment of solid recovered fuels valorisation: Waste-to-Chemicals options vs co-combustion in cement plants. Conversano A; Sogni D; Lombardelli G; Di Bona D; Viganò F; Consonni S Waste Manag; 2024 Dec; 190():432-442. PubMed ID: 39418862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production. Fyffe JR; Breckel AC; Townsend AK; Webber ME Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):276-84. PubMed ID: 26187294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design, quality, and quality assurance of solid recovered fuels for the substitution of fossil feedstock in the cement industry. Sarc R; Lorber KE; Pomberger R; Rogetzer M; Sipple EM Waste Manag Res; 2014 Jul; 32(7):565-85. PubMed ID: 24942836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When solid recovered fuel (SRF) production and consumption maximize environmental benefits? A life cycle assessment. Ferronato N; Giaquinta C; Conti F; Torretta V Waste Manag; 2024 Apr; 178():199-209. PubMed ID: 38402740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Solid recovered fuel: An experiment on classification and potential applications. Bessi C; Lombardi L; Meoni R; Canovai A; Corti A Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):184-94. PubMed ID: 26298482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of utilizing solid recovered fuel on the global warming potential of cement production and waste management system: A life cycle assessment approach. Khan MMH; Havukainen J; Horttanainen M Waste Manag Res; 2021 Apr; 39(4):561-572. PubMed ID: 33357123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Co-processing of solid recovered fuels from mixed municipal and commercial waste in the cement industry - A pathway to a circular economy. Sarc R; Viczek SA Waste Manag Res; 2024 Mar; 42(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 37382414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Case study of an MBT plant producing SRF for cement kiln co-combustion, coupled with a bioreactor landfill for process residues. Grosso M; Dellavedova S; Rigamonti L; Scotti S Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):267-75. PubMed ID: 26601731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perspectives in solid recovered fuel production in Bolivia: Analysis of characteristics and potential benefits. Ferronato N; Calle Mendoza IJ; Marconi Siñani NG; Gorritty Portillo MA; Torretta V Waste Manag; 2022 May; 144():324-335. PubMed ID: 35429870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy implications of mechanical and mechanical-biological treatment compared to direct waste-to-energy. Cimpan C; Wenzel H Waste Manag; 2013 Jul; 33(7):1648-58. PubMed ID: 23660494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The application of SRF vs. RDF classification and specifications to the material flows of two mechanical-biological treatment plants of Rome: Comparison and implications. Di Lonardo MC; Franzese M; Costa G; Gavasci R; Lombardi F Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):195-205. PubMed ID: 26243051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Origins of major and minor ash constituents of solid recovered fuel for co-processing in the cement industry. Viczek SA; Aldrian A; Pomberger R; Sarc R Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():423-432. PubMed ID: 33836393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solid recovered fuels in the cement industry with special respect to hazardous waste. Thomanetz E Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 22573713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mass, energy and material balances of SRF production process. Part 2: SRF produced from construction and demolition waste. Nasrullah M; Vainikka P; Hannula J; Hurme M; Kärki J Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25074716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An integrated appraisal of energy recovery options in the United Kingdom using solid recovered fuel derived from municipal solid waste. Garg A; Smith R; Hill D; Longhurst PJ; Pollard SJ; Simms NJ Waste Manag; 2009 Aug; 29(8):2289-97. PubMed ID: 19443201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Co-processing of plastic waste in a cement kiln: a better option. Prakash A; Palkar RR Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):24804-24814. PubMed ID: 34837105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Life cycle costing of energy recovery from solid recovered fuel produced in MBT plants in Italy. Rigamonti L; Borghi G; Martignon G; Grosso M Waste Manag; 2019 Nov; 99():154-162. PubMed ID: 31479845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current issues on the production and utilization of medium-calorific solid recovered fuel: a case study on SRF for the HOTDISC technology. Pomberger R; Klampfl-Pernold H; Abl C Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 22452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The strategy for conservation non-renewable natural resources through producing and application solid recovery fuel in the cement industry: a case study for Lithuania. Pitak I; Rinkevičius D; Kalpokaitė-Dičkuvienė R; Baltušnikas A; Denafas G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(46):69618-69634. PubMed ID: 35576030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics. Gug J; Cacciola D; Sobkowicz MJ Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():283-92. PubMed ID: 25453320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]