These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 394211)

  • 21. Reactions to implants of conventional and new dental restorative materials.
    Matsui A; Buonocore M; Sayegh F; Yamaki M
    J Dent Child; 1967 Sep; 34(5):316-22. PubMed ID: 5341569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Histological and cytological changes of tissue caused by inserted dental metallic materials. 3. Dental Ag-Sn amalgam.
    Kita K; Okamoto T; Amari M; Tsuji K; Imamoto T
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1967; 1(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 5287604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?
    Mackert JR; Wahl MJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):601-10. PubMed ID: 15468542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Biocompatibility of hardened amalgams in subcutaneous implantation with regard to surface changes].
    Welker D; Neupert G; Katenkamp D; Sasama F
    Stomatol DDR; 1984 Jul; 34(7):400-6. PubMed ID: 6592846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biocompatibility of resin composites subcutaneously implanted in rats with experimentally induced arthritis.
    Anagnostou M; Chatzigianni E; Doucoudakis S; Potamianou A; Tesseromatis C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):863-7. PubMed ID: 19203785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials.
    Schuster GS; Lefebvre CA; Wataha JC; White SN
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):17-31. PubMed ID: 9120609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Esthetic pontic materials--biocompatibility and scanning electron microscopic study.
    Nasr HH; Iskander KG; el Karaksi AO
    Egypt Dent J; 1989 Jul; 35(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 2487298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Histologic evaluation of the characteristics of tissue biocompatibility of 4 materials used in endodontics].
    Calura G; Nonato M; Mazzoli S; Berti G; Ventrelli I
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1984; 26(5):43-8. PubMed ID: 6242174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biocompatibility of dental amalgams in vitro during 52 week period.
    Nakamura M; Kawahara H; Kataoka Y; Maehara S; Izutani M; Taguchi H
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1980 Jul; 21(55):228-44. PubMed ID: 6934232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biocompatibility of acrylic resins implants in connective tissue.
    Nagem-Filho H; Chiodi-Netto J; De Araujo PA
    Estomatol Cult; 1973; 7(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 4535985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Tissue response to cavity varnishes. Cavity Lining, Tubulidrox, Perio-Vidans and solvent].
    Fernando Goes M; Consani S; Bozzo L
    RGO; 1983; 31(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 6594730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
    Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Local argyrosis of oral mucosa or amalgam tattoo. A problem in diagnosis and treatment.
    Jańczuk Z; Banach J
    Adv Med Sci; 2006; 51 Suppl 1():62-5. PubMed ID: 17458063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exposure to mercury vapor during setting, removing, and polishing amalgam restorations.
    Haikel Y; Gasser P; Salek P; Voegel JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Nov; 24(11):1551-8. PubMed ID: 2279986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of biologic compatibility of dental materials.
    Nagem Filho H; de Araujo PA; Moraes N; Chiodi Netto J
    Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 4525850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tissue reaction to dispersion alloy amalgam.
    Nagem-Filho H; Araujo PA; Chiodi-Netto J; Vieira DF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1976 Oct; 36(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 1067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Histopathologic reactions of the connective subcutaneous tissue of the rat to the implantation of silver amalgam alloy. I].
    Nagem Filho H; Fleury RN; de Ararjo PA; Vieira DF; de Abreu D
    Estomatol Cult; 1972; 6(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 4516989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Biocompatibility of carbon fibers and carbon microparticles].
    Wolter D
    Aktuelle Probl Chir Orthop; 1983; 25():30-8. PubMed ID: 6136205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recommendations for determining biocompatibility and safety for the clinical use of metals in dentistry.
    Stanford JW
    Int Dent J; 1986 Mar; 36(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3457768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Experimental study of the biocompatibility of a new glass-ionomer root canal sealer (Ketac-Endo).
    Kolokuris I; Beltes P; Economides N; Vlemmas I
    J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):395-8. PubMed ID: 8941745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.