BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3942357)

  • 1. Comparison of the effectiveness of different cervical immobilization collars.
    McCabe JB; Nolan DJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 1986 Jan; 15(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 3942357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models.
    Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How effective is the Newport/Aspen collar? A prospective radiographic evaluation in healthy adult volunteers.
    Hughes SJ
    J Trauma; 1998 Aug; 45(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 9715199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
    Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
    Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses.
    Gavin TM; Carandang G; Havey R; Flanagan P; Ghanayem A; Patwardhan AG
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 15077665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury.
    Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 21397431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cineradiography of the braced normal cervical spine. A comparative study of five commonly used cervical orthoses.
    Hartman JT; Palumbo F; Hill BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):97-102. PubMed ID: 1132211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Length dependence of a halo orthosis on cervical immobilization.
    Triggs KJ; Ballock RT; Byrne T; Garfin SR
    J Spinal Disord; 1993 Feb; 6(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 8439714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of remaining motion using one innovative upper airway opening cervical collar and two traditional cervical collars.
    Jung MK; von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt GVR; Keil H; Grützner PA; Schneider NRE; Kreinest M
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20619. PubMed ID: 34663847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Angulation of the pediatric cervical spine with and without cervical collar.
    Treloar DJ; Nypaver M
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 1997 Feb; 13(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9061725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical spine alignment in immobilized hockey players: radiographic analysis with and without helmets and shoulder pads.
    Metz CM; Kuhn JE; Greenfield ML
    Clin J Sport Med; 1998 Apr; 8(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 9641436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervical collars: a clinical and biomechanical study].
    Bruns W; Von Salis-Soglio G; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 15346303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The yale cervical orthosis: an evaluation of its effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects and a comparison with other cervical orthoses.
    Johnson RM; Hart DL; Owen JR; Lerner E; Chapin W; Zeleznik R
    Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 662928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.