These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3942709)

  • 1. Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?
    Soutter WP; Wisdom S; Brough AK; Monaghan JM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Jan; 93(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 3942709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
    Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
    BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
    al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
    J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
    Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
    Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
    Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
    Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colposcopy in a family planning clinic: a future model?
    Kitchener HC; Burnett RA; Wilson ES; Cordiner JW
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6583):1313-5. PubMed ID: 3109632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of women with index smear showing mild dyskaryosis: effects of age and evidence of HPV infection.
    Winn CM; Jones H
    Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):281-9. PubMed ID: 16303041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision analysis for best management of mildly dyskaryotic smear.
    Johnson N; Sutton J; Thornton JG; Lilford RJ; Johnson VA; Peel KR
    Lancet; 1993 Jul; 342(8863):91-6. PubMed ID: 8100917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
    Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of atypical cervical smears.
    Morrison BW; Erickson ER; Doshi N; Russo JF
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Oct; 33(10):809-12. PubMed ID: 3193410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective follow up study of women with colposcopically unconfirmed positive cervical smears.
    Milne DS; Wadehra V; Mennim D; Wagstaff TI
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jan; 106(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 10426257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
    Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
    BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A long-term study of women with normal colposcopy after referral with low-grade cytological abnormalities.
    Smith MC; Keech SE; Perryman K; Soutter WP
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 17059394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
    Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
    Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
    Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
    Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mild cervical dyskaryosis: safety of cytological surveillance.
    Jones MH; Jenkins D; Cuzick J; Wolfendale MR; Jones JJ; Balogun-Lynch C; Usherwood MM; Singer A
    Lancet; 1992 Jun; 339(8807):1440-3. PubMed ID: 1351129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of high-grade CIN following mild dyskaryotic smears in different age groups.
    Giannopoulos T; Butler-Manuel S; Tailor A; Demetriou E; Daborn L
    Cytopathology; 2005 Dec; 16(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 16303040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How significant is a cervical smear showing glandular dyskaryosis?
    Pisal NV; Sindos M; Desai S; Mansell E; Singer A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Jun; 108(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12781413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.