These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3942941)

  • 1. Victoria Gillick and the age of consent: a transatlantic view.
    Emson HE
    CMAJ; 1986 Feb; 134(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 3942941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. House of Lords rules DHSS guidance on contraception lawful.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1985 Oct; 2(8461):959-60. PubMed ID: 2865463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consent to treatment by parents and children. Working Group of the Northern Health Region in Current Medical/Ethical Problems.
    Child Care Health Dev; 1986; 12(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 3955796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal aspects of consent 8: children under the age of 16 years.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Jun 28-Jul 11; 10(12):797-9. PubMed ID: 11972124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children and consent to medical treatment.
    Korgaonkar G; Tribe D
    Br J Nurs; 1993 Apr 8-21; 2(7):383-4. PubMed ID: 8508023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):59-61. PubMed ID: 2856993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Teenage confidence and consent.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6462):144-5. PubMed ID: 3917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical treatment of children.
    Kerr G
    North Irel Leg Q; 1984; 35(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11658590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can children withhold consent to treatment?
    Devereux JA; Jones DP; Dickenson DL
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6890):1459-61. PubMed ID: 8518645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The underage girl: a surprising judgment.
    Slack K
    Christ Century; 1985 Nov; 102(36):1054-6. PubMed ID: 11658599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limiting Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Professional confidence in relation to young persons who seek treatment concerning pregnancy or contraceptive advice.
    Great Britain. General Medical Council
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):470. PubMed ID: 11644443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Under-age contraception--whose responsibility?
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Oct; 64(16):603-4. PubMed ID: 11644057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):24-5. PubMed ID: 11644441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BMA comments on Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6503):1209. PubMed ID: 11653679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confidentiality and young people.
    Gillick V
    Ethics Med; 1988; 4(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 11659097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DHSS's revised guidance on contraceptive services for young people.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6522):782. PubMed ID: 11658692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consent to medical treatment: teenagers and the law.
    Korgaonkar G; Tribe D
    Br J Hosp Med; 1993 Aug 18-31; 50(4):208-9. PubMed ID: 8401905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.