BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3942996)

  • 1. Has monitoring of the contralateral breast improved the prognosis in patients treated for primary breast cancer?
    Senofsky GM; Wanebo HJ; Wilhelm MC; Pope TL; Fechner RE; Broaddus W; Kaiser DL
    Cancer; 1986 Feb; 57(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 3942996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral breast cancer. Risk reduction by contralateral biopsy.
    Wanebo HJ; Senofsky GM; Fechner RE; Kaiser D; Lynn S; Paradies J
    Ann Surg; 1985 Jun; 201(6):667-77. PubMed ID: 4004380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
    Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
    Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Metachronous tumors of the breast. Mammographic findings].
    Tella S; Occhiato R; Speziale AM; Poggi R; Grasso F; Frasca F; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 8146360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer.
    Kim JY; Cho N; Koo HR; Yi A; Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Han W; Moon HG; Im SA; Noh DY; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23329656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
    Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer.
    Kaas R; Hart AA; Besnard AP; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ
    Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 11136324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence and tumour characteristics of bilateral and unilateral interval breast cancers at screening mammography.
    van Bommel RMG; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Setz-Pels W; Louwman MWJ; Strobbe LJ; Venderink D; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():101-106. PubMed ID: 29306176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
    Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammographic appearance of cancer in the opposite breast: comparison with the first cancer.
    Roubidoux MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C; Joynt LK; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 8571898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral breast carcinoma: risk factors and outcomes for patients with synchronous and metachronous disease.
    Heron DE; Komarnicky LT; Hyslop T; Schwartz GF; Mansfield CM
    Cancer; 2000 Jun; 88(12):2739-50. PubMed ID: 10870056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral breast cancer.
    Fracchia AA; Borgen PI
    Semin Surg Oncol; 1991; 7(5):300-5. PubMed ID: 1775816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumour characteristics of bilateral screen-detected cancers and bilateral interval cancers in women participating at biennial screening mammography.
    van Bommel R; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Setz-Pels W; Strobbe LJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LE
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():215-221. PubMed ID: 30396659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival in bilateral breast cancer.
    Fracchia AA; Robinson D; Legaspi A; Greenall MJ; Kinne DW; Groshen S
    Cancer; 1985 Mar; 55(6):1414-21. PubMed ID: 3971312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Triple approach method for screening of contralateral breast in treated cases of breast cancer.
    Deshpande AH; Munshi M; Gaikwad S; Deshpande KM
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 46(3):385-9. PubMed ID: 15025280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved prognosis of women aged 75 and older with mammography-detected breast cancer.
    Malmgren JA; Parikh J; Atwood MK; Kaplan HG
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 25093690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.