These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3943833)
1. New PRO guidelines seen as good, but.. Gallivan M Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(4):30, 33. PubMed ID: 3943833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers? Kotelchuck R Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. HCFA ordered to pay costs of hospitals' PRO copying. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1989 Apr; 19(17):6. PubMed ID: 10292675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. WIPRO/HCFA futility. Mayersak JS Wis Med J; 1986 Nov; 85(11):16-7. PubMed ID: 3811389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A letter from the Arkansas Foundation for Medical Care, Inc. Wilson MC J Ark Med Soc; 1989 Oct; 86(5):189. PubMed ID: 2532199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenges from the Health Care Financing Administration. Vogel TT Ohio Med; 1990 Mar; 86(3):167. PubMed ID: 2333189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspectives. PRO goals: realistic or risky? Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 31(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10273546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The long and the short of it. QRC Advis; 1989 Jan; 5(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 10293937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program. Roper WL Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PSROs of the second kind. Seidenberg GR Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jun; 6(6):24-9. PubMed ID: 351313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. An overview. Federgreen WR J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Apr; 80(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 8505613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New PRO director seeking advice to improve program. Baldwin MF Mod Healthc; 1986 Oct; 16(22):36-7. PubMed ID: 10301090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Utilization and Quality Control Peer Review Organization (PRO); correction--HCFA. Fed Regist; 1985 Oct; 50(200):41886-7. PubMed ID: 10300452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A PRO report card. Webber AH Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10301023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. New PRO contracts fuel debate. Cotton P Med World News; 1986 Apr; 27(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10276403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Racial and ethnic disparities in Medicare: what the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services can, and should, do. Jost TS DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 9(1):667-718. PubMed ID: 17061383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. PRO scrutiny means more hospital involvement. Interview by Myk Cherskov. Dehn T Hospitals; 1987 Mar; 61(6):103-4. PubMed ID: 3546060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]