These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3944865)

  • 1. The role of transrectal aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer.
    Chodak GW; Steinberg GD; Bibbo M; Wied G; Straus FS; Vogelzang NJ; Schoenberg HW
    J Urol; 1986 Feb; 135(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 3944865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transrectal aspiration biopsy versus transperineal core biopsy for the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate.
    Chodak GW; Bibbo M; Straus FH; Wied GL
    J Urol; 1984 Sep; 132(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 6471180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cytological diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by transrectal fine needle aspiration.
    Hosking DH; Paraskevas M; Hellsten OR; Ramsey EW
    J Urol; 1983 May; 129(5):998-1000. PubMed ID: 6854779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transrectal needle aspiration versus transperineal needle biopsy in diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma.
    Deliveliotis C; Stavropoulos NJ; Macrychoritis C; Koutsokalis G; Kostakopoulos
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1995; 27(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 7591574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transrectal needle aspiration versus transperineal needle biopsy in diagnosis of carcinoma of prostate.
    Whelan JP; Chin JL; Shapre JR; Davis IR
    Urology; 1986 May; 27(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 3705274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Needle aspiration and core biopsy of prostate cancer: comparative evaluation with biplanar transrectal US guidance.
    Lee F; Littrup PJ; McLeary RD; Kumusaka GH; Borlaza GS; McHugh TA; Soiderer MH; Roi LD
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 3550883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine needle aspiration of the abnormal prostate: a cytohistological correlation.
    Carter HB; Riehle RA; Koizumi JH; Amberson J; Vaughan ED
    J Urol; 1986 Feb; 135(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 3944864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytologic diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Community hospital experience.
    Dejter SW; Constantinople NL; Bresette JF; Spence IJ; Reichert CM
    Urology; 1988 Mar; 31(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 3347978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Subjectivity and objectivity in transperineal biopsy and transrectal prostatic aspiration cytology].
    Blasco Casares FJ; Saladié Roig JM; Pinsach Elías L; Ibarz Servio L; Llatjos Sanuy M
    Rev Clin Esp; 1992 May; 190(9):460-2. PubMed ID: 1378228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrospective analysis of 645 simultaneous perineal punch biopsies and transrectal aspiration biopsies for diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma.
    Ackermann R; Müller HA
    Eur Urol; 1977; 3(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 837951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A study of transrectal aspiration biopsy of the prostate].
    Fujioka T; Ishii N; Chiba R; Majima K; Numata I; Hakozaki H
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1984 Sep; 30(9):1189-94. PubMed ID: 6524561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transrectal fine-needle aspiration and truecut needle biopsy of the prostate: a blinded comparison of accuracy.
    Klotz LH; Shaw PA; Srigley JR
    Can J Surg; 1989 Jul; 32(4):287-9. PubMed ID: 2660974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of transrectal prostate digital aspiration and ultrasound-guided core biopsies in 99 men.
    Waisman J; Adolfsson J; Löwhagen T; Skoog L
    Urology; 1991 Apr; 37(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 2014593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized comparison of diagnostic efficacy between transperineal and transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy.
    Takenaka A; Hara R; Ishimura T; Fujii T; Jo Y; Nagai A; Fujisawa M
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 17533394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined biopsy techniques: an approach to the diagnosis of prostatic malignancy.
    Goldenberg SL; Ajzen SA; Allen GJ; Cooperberg PL; Perler Z; Chan NH
    J Urol; 1989 Apr; 141(4):870-2. PubMed ID: 2648029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.
    Watanabe M; Hayashi T; Tsushima T; Irie S; Kaneshige T; Kumon H
    Int J Urol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):959-63. PubMed ID: 16351651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Franzén transrectal fine-needle biopsy versus ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate gland.
    Adolfsson J; Skoog L; Löwhagen T; Waisman J
    Acta Oncol; 1991; 30(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 2029399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.
    Miller J; Perumalla C; Heap G
    ANZ J Surg; 2005; 75(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 15740517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transrectal aspiration biopsy of the prostate: the importance of atypia.
    Smith FL; Bibbo M; Schoenberg HW; Chodak GW
    J Urol; 1988 Oct; 140(4):766-8. PubMed ID: 3418797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].
    Damiano R; Oliva A; Cantiello F; Esposito C; Perdonà S; De Sio M; Bitonti M; Sacco R; D'Armiento M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2003 Mar; 75(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12741345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.