96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3945753)
1. Ejection fraction determination by MR imaging: comparison with left ventricular angiography.
Stratemeier EJ; Thompson R; Brady TJ; Miller SW; Saini S; Wismer GL; Okada RD; Dinsmore RE
Radiology; 1986 Mar; 158(3):775-7. PubMed ID: 3945753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical application of ejection fraction by gated MRI.
Lee T; Lee SK; Cheng CH; Liao SQ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1992 Sep; 50(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 1330245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Left ventricular short-axis plane for magnetic resonance imaging: its clinical importance and applications].
Suzuki J; Sakamoto T; Kawakubo K; Hada Y; Amano K; Takenaka K; Hasegawa I; Shiota T; Sugimoto T; Nishikawa J
J Cardiol; 1987 Jun; 17(2):249-58. PubMed ID: 3448166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gated cardiac MRI: ejection-fraction determination using the right anterior oblique view.
Buckwalter KA; Aisen AM; Dilworth LR; Mancini GB; Buda AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 3487226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Noninvasive evaluation of the left and right ventricular function using magnetic resonance].
Raisaro A; Campani R
Radiol Med; 1991 Apr; 81(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 2028034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of ventricular function with gated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Osbakken M; Yuschok T
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1986; 12(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 3731263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of cardiac ejection fraction and left ventricular volume: contrast-enhanced ultrafast cine MR imaging vs IV digital subtraction ventriculography.
Matsumura K; Nakase E; Haiyama T; Takeo K; Shimizu K; Yamasaki K; Kohno K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):979-85. PubMed ID: 8470613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography.
Williams KA; Taillon LA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 8522692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Left ventricular ejection fraction using 64-slice CT coronary angiography and new evaluation software: initial experience.
Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Iv M; Ruehm SG; Saleh R; Panknin C; Goldin JG
Br J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 81(966):450-5. PubMed ID: 18347027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of left ventricular volume and mass with use of biphasic spin-echo MR imaging: comparison with cine MR.
Caputo GR; Suzuki J; Kondo C; Cho H; Quaife RA; Higgins CB; Parker DL
Radiology; 1990 Dec; 177(3):773-7. PubMed ID: 2243988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. First-pass radionuclide angiographic analysis with two regions of interest to improve left ventricular ejection fraction accuracy.
Williams KA; Bryant TA; Taillon LA
J Nucl Med; 1998 Nov; 39(11):1857-61. PubMed ID: 9829570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.
Juergens KU; Grude M; Maintz D; Fallenberg EM; Wichter T; Heindel W; Fischbach R
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 14668428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-effectiveness, observer-dependence, and accuracy of measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction using 4-channel MDCT.
Boehm T; Alkadhi H; Roffi M; Willmann JK; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Wildermuth S
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 15088177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Severity and extent of coronary artery disease and their relationship to left ventricular functional reserve in the chronic disease state].
Tsuiki K; Kanaya T; Hayasaka M; Oguma M; Ota I; Kaminishi T; Yamaguchi S; Ohara N; Tonooka I; Yasui S
J Cardiogr Suppl; 1986; (8):15-24. PubMed ID: 3722876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of left and right ventricular volume measurement using the Simpson's method and the area length method.
Hergan K; Schuster A; Frühwald J; Mair M; Burger R; Töpker M
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 17498903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Movement of the mitral valve in patients with ischemic cardiopathy].
Oliveira JA; Lousada N; da Silva N; Bernardes L; Quininha J; Salomão S
Rev Port Cardiol; 1989 Jun; 8(6):443-6. PubMed ID: 2631850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ideal site for ventricular anchoring of artificial chordae in mitral regurgitation.
Weber A; Hurni S; Vandenberghe S; Wahl A; Aymard T; Vogel R; Carrel T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S78-81. PubMed ID: 22035963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac volumetry. Comparison of echoplanar and conventional cine-magnetic resonance data-acquisition strategies.
Unterweger M; Debatin JF; Leung DA; Wildermuth S; McKinnon GC; von Schulthess GK
Invest Radiol; 1994 Nov; 29(11):994-1000. PubMed ID: 7890515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Short- and long-term changes in left ventricular function after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation].
Pál M; Lengyel M
Orv Hetil; 2000 May; 141(21):1127-31. PubMed ID: 10876315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
