96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3945753)
41. [Comparison of the left ventricular stroke volume and fraction measured with MRI and contrast ventriculography].
Germain P; Baruthio J; Mossard JM; Wecker D; Chambron J; Sacrez A
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1989 Jun; 38(6):319-25. PubMed ID: 2667443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Dimensional accuracy of magnetic resonance in studies of the heart.
Longmore DB; Klipstein RH; Underwood SR; Firmin DN; Hounsfield GN; Watanabe M; Bland C; Fox K; Poole-Wilson PA; Rees RS
Lancet; 1985 Jun; 1(8442):1360-2. PubMed ID: 2861314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Cardiac ejection fraction: phantom study comparing cine MR imaging, radionuclide blood pool imaging, and ventriculography.
Debatin JF; Nadel SN; Paolini JF; Sostman HD; Coleman RE; Evans AJ; Beam C; Spritzer CE; Bashore TM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 1562764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction using ultrafast computed tomography.
Rich S; Chomka EV; Stagl R; Shanes JG; Kondos GT; Brundage BH
Am Heart J; 1986 Aug; 112(2):392-6. PubMed ID: 3739886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison between videodensitometric and angiocardiographic determination of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with cardiac disease.
Björk L; Erikson U
Ups J Med Sci; 1978; 83(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 705972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Global left ventricular cardiac function: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, radionuclide angiography, and contrast angiography.
Lethimonnier F; Furber A; Balzer P; Morel O; Rouleau F; Delépine S; Pezard P; Geslin P; Jallet P; Le Jeune JJ
Invest Radiol; 1999 Mar; 34(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 10084664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A rapid method for standardization of the gated radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction.
Purnell GL; Baker BJ; Murphy MM; Boyd CM; Dalrymple GV
Clin Nucl Med; 1990 Aug; 15(8):552-5. PubMed ID: 2390818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cine MR determination of left ventricular ejection fraction.
Utz JA; Herfkens RJ; Heinsimer JA; Bashore T; Califf R; Glover G; Pelc N; Shimakawa A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 May; 148(5):839-43. PubMed ID: 3495115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Dilworth LR; Aisen AM; Mancini GB; Lande I; Buda AJ
Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 3799438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Coronary MR angiography at 3T during diastole and systole.
Gharib AM; Herzka DA; Ustun AO; Desai MY; Locklin J; Pettigrew RI; Stuber M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 17896391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography.
Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Coronary MR angiography during peak-systole: work in progress.
Duerinckx A; Atkinson DP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(6):979-86. PubMed ID: 9400840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A brief evaluation of cardiac gated MRI in left ventricular ejection fraction determinations: a comparison with standard left ventriculography DSA and nuclear medicine.
Le Page R; Crandall CR; Hood CH; Enerson RD; Schrepel J; Sweatman TW; Fleetwood DJ
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1986; 29(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 3740747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction of Depressed Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Electrocardiogram.
Thabsheera H; Shivakumar BR; Hafeez M; Kk S
J Assoc Physicians India; 2022 Apr; 70(4):11-12. PubMed ID: 35443402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The effect of energy window on cardiac ejection fraction.
Bacharach SL; Green MV; Bonow RO; Findley SL; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Larson SM
J Nucl Med; 1988 Mar; 29(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 3346745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Quantitative angiographic and morphologic aspects of aortic valve atresia.
Hastreiter AR; Van der Horst RL; Dubrow IW; Eckner FO
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Jun; 51(10):1705-8. PubMed ID: 6858879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart for determination of ejection fraction.
van Rossum AC; Visser FC; van Eenige MJ; Valk J; Roos JP
Int J Cardiol; 1988 Jan; 18(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 3343064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The carotid and ECG pulses as indices for nuclear cardiography imaging.
Dagan J; Bigon A
Eur J Nucl Med; 1981; 6(9):397-402. PubMed ID: 7274290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The nature of the background in radionuclide ventriculography: deductions from the mathematical behaviour of the ejection fraction.
Gandsman EJ; North DL; Bough EW
Phys Med Biol; 1990 Nov; 35(11):1467-76. PubMed ID: 2287624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Unilateral breast uptake on radionuclide ventriculography.
Pelletier-Galarneau M; Sogbein OO; Pham XH; Zuckier LS
Clin Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 39(7):629-31. PubMed ID: 24662654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
