98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3945799)
1. Who should have rights to a patient's cells?
Sun M
Science; 1986 Feb; 231(4738):543-4. PubMed ID: 3945799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Human tissue research: who owns the results?
Wagner AB
J Pat Trademark Off Soc; 1987 Jun; 69(6):329-52. PubMed ID: 11649984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Source compensation for tissues and cells used in biotechnical research: why a source shouldn't share in the profits.
Dillon TP
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(4):628-45. PubMed ID: 11650898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An alternative to property rights in human tissue.
Swain MS; Marusyk RW
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):12-5. PubMed ID: 2228577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward the right of commerciality: recognizing property rights in the commercial value of human tissue.
Hardiman R
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):207-64. PubMed ID: 11659048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cells, sales, and royalties: the patient's right to a portion of the profits.
Danforth MT
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):179-202. PubMed ID: 11650242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond Moore: issues of law and policy impacting human cell and genetic research in the age of biotechnology.
Hartman RG
J Leg Med; 1993 Sep; 14(3):463-77. PubMed ID: 7779167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue.
Field NE
Yale Law J; 1989 Oct; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moore v. Regents of the University of California: expanded disclosure, limited property rights.
Potts J
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 86(2):453-96. PubMed ID: 11659500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Body parts for sale.
Gorman C
Time; 1998 Mar; 151(9):76. PubMed ID: 11655275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recognizing property interests in bodily tissues. A need for legislative guidance.
Parker PM
J Leg Med; 1989 Jun; 10(2):357-75. PubMed ID: 2760536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal tissue transplantation: regulating the medical hope for the future.
Sedlak JF
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 11659312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outrageous fortune: selling other people's cells.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 2283288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The sale of human organs: implicating a privacy right.
Johnson KL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1987; 21(3):741-62. PubMed ID: 11649985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ownership of cells raises sticky issues.
Sun M
Science; 1985 Nov; 230(4727):789. PubMed ID: 4059910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Owning our bodies: an examination of property law and biotechnology.
Gold R
San Diego Law Rev; 1995; 32(4):1167-247. PubMed ID: 11656846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who owns the body? On the ethics of using human tissues for commercial purposes.
Murray TH
IRB; 1986; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Whose waste is it anyway? The case of John Moore.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(5):37-9. PubMed ID: 3066788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conferring a federal property right in genetic material: stepping into the future with the Genetic Privacy Act.
Lin MM
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):109-34. PubMed ID: 8819598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
