These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3945965)

  • 1. Uncertainty of the slope determination by the moving average method.
    Weil CS
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1986 Feb; 82(2):386-7. PubMed ID: 3945965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economical LD50 and slope determinations.
    Weil CS
    Drug Chem Toxicol; 1983; 6(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 6653444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Calculation of the standard error of the effective dose ratio].
    Prozorovskiĭ VB; Frumin GT
    Farmakol Toksikol; 1991; 54(1):69-70. PubMed ID: 1860508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Method for the quantitative evaluation of the combined effect on the body of 2 or more harmful chemical factors].
    Manenko AK
    Gig Sanit; 1982 Oct; (10):70-2. PubMed ID: 7173654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The curve doses vs survival time in the evaluation of acute toxicity.
    Molinengo L
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 1979 May; 31(5):343-4. PubMed ID: 37311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Probability assessment of the effective and threshold dosages in a toxicological experiment].
    Shtabskiĭ BM; Krasovskiĭ GN; Kudrina VN; Zholdakova ZI
    Gig Sanit; 1979 Sep; (9):41-5. PubMed ID: 499879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A method of quantitative evaluation of combined effects of 2 toxic components].
    Gusakov AE; Toderishin MG
    Gig Sanit; 1991 Dec; (12):80-2. PubMed ID: 1816048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computational methods for determining the approximate toxicity of slightly volatile compounds].
    Lisman MB; Liublina EI; Rabotnikova LV
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1978 Mar; (3):34-8. PubMed ID: 631597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative evaluation of different methods for studying the cumulative properties of hazardous substances].
    Novikov SM; Fursova TN; Kozeeva EE; Porokhova LA; Arkhangel'skiĭ VI
    Gig Sanit; 1987 Sep; (9):41-4. PubMed ID: 3678869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessing the complex action of chemical compounds].
    Timoflievskaia LA; Mel'nikova NN
    Gig Sanit; 1980 Aug; (8):50-3. PubMed ID: 7409525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Various suggestions on the unification of methods for experimental substantiation of maximum permissible concentration of chemical carcinogens].
    Litvinov NN; Titova TA
    Gig Sanit; 1977 Oct; (10):69-73. PubMed ID: 598727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Strategy of long-term animal testing for quantitative evaluation of chemical carcinogenicity.
    Hayashi Y; Kurokawa Y; Maekawa A; Takahashi M
    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci; 1986; 12():383-91. PubMed ID: 3549239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of pharmacokinetic principles in the extrapolation of animal data to humans.
    Gillette JR
    Clin Toxicol; 1976; 9(5):709-22. PubMed ID: 1000904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Determining the values of threshold levels of the effects of harmful substances].
    Novikov SM; Levchenko NI; Me'lnikova NN; Fursova TN
    Gig Sanit; 1989 Sep; (9):46-9. PubMed ID: 2591784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A rapid method for the determination of the median effective dose and its errors].
    Prozopovskii VB; Prozorovskaia MP; Demchenko VM
    Farmakol Toksikol; 1978; 41(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 668880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative characteristics of methods of mathematical evaluation of the combined effects of 2 or more harmful chemical factors in their single and successive administration in acute experiments].
    Manenko AK; Ivanova OP
    Gig Sanit; 1988 Nov; (11):55-8. PubMed ID: 2468583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of "dose-response'' characterization].
    Renwick A
    Vopr Pitan; 2001; 70(6):32-41. PubMed ID: 11868437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The prediction of the toxic effect of chemical substances].
    Nevmerzhitskiĭ NS; Sofronov GA; Tiunov LA
    Voen Med Zh; 1991 Sep; (9):42-5. PubMed ID: 1759357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A dose-response model incorporating nonlinear kinetics.
    Van Ryzin J; Rai K
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 3567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U-shaped dose-response curves: their occurrence and implications for risk assessment.
    Davis JM; Svendsgaard DJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1990 Jun; 30(2):71-83. PubMed ID: 2192070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.