These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3946261)

  • 1. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on DDD pacemakers.
    Erlebacher JA; Cahill PT; Pannizzo F; Knowles RJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Feb; 57(6):437-40. PubMed ID: 3946261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers.
    Lauck G; von Smekal A; Wolke S; Seelos KC; Jung W; Manz M; Lüderitz B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1549-55. PubMed ID: 7479176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acute effects of radiofrequency ablation of atrial arrhythmias on implanted permanent pacing systems.
    Ellenbogen KA; Wood MA; Stambler BS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Sep; 19(9):1287-95. PubMed ID: 8880792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by portable media players.
    Thaker JP; Patel MB; Jongnarangsin K; Liepa VV; Thakur RK
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Apr; 5(4):538-44. PubMed ID: 18329961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on cardiac pacemakers and electrodes.
    Achenbach S; Moshage W; Diem B; Bieberle T; Schibgilla V; Bachmann K
    Am Heart J; 1997 Sep; 134(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 9327704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Myopotential interference with DDD pacemakers: endocardial electrographic telemetry in the diagnosis of pacemaker-related arrhythmias.
    Halperin JL; Camuñas JL; Stern EH; Rothlauf EB; Kupersmith J; Estioko MR; Mace RC; Steinmetz MY; Teichholz LE
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jul; 54(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 6741845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intermittent pacemaker dysfunction caused by digital mobile telephones.
    Naegeli B; Osswald S; Deola M; Burkart F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 May; 27(6):1471-7. PubMed ID: 8626960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic article surveillance: a possible danger for pacemaker patients.
    Dodinot B; Godenir JP; Costa AB
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jan; 16(1 Pt 1):46-53. PubMed ID: 7681175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla?
    Vahlhaus C; Sommer T; Lewalter T; Schimpf R; Schumacher B; Jung W; Lüderitz B
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):489-95. PubMed ID: 11341087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference of cellular phones with implanted permanent pacemakers.
    Chen WH; Lau CP; Leung SK; Ho DS; Lee IS
    Clin Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11):881-6. PubMed ID: 8914782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do media players cause interference with pacemakers?
    Thaker JP; Patel MB; Shah AJ; Liepa VV; Brunett JD; Jongnarangsin K; Gardiner JC; Thakur R
    Clin Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 32(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 19938055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pacemaker reed switch behavior in 0.5, 1.5, and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging units: are reed switches always closed in strong magnetic fields?
    Luechinger R; Duru F; Zeijlemaker VA; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Candinas R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Oct; 25(10):1419-23. PubMed ID: 12418737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Arrhythmia in patients with a DDD bicameral pacemaker].
    Occhetta E; Magnani A; Prando MD; Perucca A; Rossi L; Rognoni G; Rossi P
    G Ital Cardiol; 1986 Nov; 16(11):909-21. PubMed ID: 2435600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.
    Sommer T; Naehle CP; Yang A; Zeijlemaker V; Hackenbroch M; Schmiedel A; Meyer C; Strach K; Skowasch D; Vahlhaus C; Litt H; Schild H
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 16966587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of interactions between permanent pacemakers and electronic antitheft surveillance systems.
    Mugica J; Henry L; Podeur H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Mar; 23(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 10750133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance imagers on external and implantable pulse generators.
    Fetter J; Aram G; Holmes DR; Gray JE; Hayes DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1984 Jul; 7(4):720-7. PubMed ID: 6205375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of 1.5 tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers.
    Hayes DL; Holmes DR; Gray JE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Oct; 10(4):782-6. PubMed ID: 3655146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of 50 to 60 Hz and of 20 to 50 kHz magnetic fields on the operation of implanted cardiac pacemakers].
    Frank R; Souques M; Himbert C; Hidden-Lucet F; Petitot JC; Fontaine G; Lambrozo J; Magne I; Bailly JM
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2003 Apr; 96 Spec No 3():35-41. PubMed ID: 12741330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging for patients with permanent pacemakers: initial clinical experience.
    Goldsher D; Amikam S; Boulos M; Suleiman M; Shreiber R; Eran A; Goldshmid Y; Mazbar R; Roguin A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2006 Feb; 8(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 16544729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers.
    Gimbel JR; Johnson D; Levine PA; Wilkoff BL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 8774821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.