These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3946401)
1. Matching on a non-risk factor in the design of case-control studies does not always result in an efficiency loss. Kalish LA Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Mar; 123(3):551-4. PubMed ID: 3946401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Matching in epidemiologic studies: validity and efficiency considerations. Kupper LL; Karon JM; Kleinbaum DG; Morgenstern H; Lewis DK Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):271-91. PubMed ID: 7272415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficiency of matching in case-control studies of risk-factor interactions. Thomas DC; Greenland S J Chronic Dis; 1985; 38(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 4008599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In defense of matching. Karon JM; Kupper LL Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 7148808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological issues in case-control studies: II. Test statistics as measures of efficiency. Choi BC; Howe GR Int J Epidemiol; 1984 Jun; 13(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 6735570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Considerations in determining matching criteria and stratum sizes for case-control studies. Greenland S; Morgenstern H; Thomas DC Int J Epidemiol; 1981 Dec; 10(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 7327839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: "flexible matching strategies to increase power and efficiency to detect and estimate gene-environment interactions in case-control studies". Schill W; Wild P Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Jun; 159(11):1107-8; author reply 1108. PubMed ID: 15155296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The design of case-control studies: the influence of confounding and interaction effects. Smith PG; Day NE Int J Epidemiol; 1984 Sep; 13(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 6386716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matching and efficiency in cohort studies. Greenland S; Morgenstern H Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jan; 131(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 2293747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pair-matching-a reappraisal of a popular technique. McKinlay SM Biometrics; 1977 Dec; 33(4):725-35. PubMed ID: 588658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential gain in efficiency and power to detect gene-environment interactions by matching in case-control studies. Stürmer T; Brenner H Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 10603459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficient Sampling in Unmatched Case-Control Studies When the Total Number of Cases and Controls Is Fixed. Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M Epidemiology; 2017 Nov; 28(6):834-837. PubMed ID: 28682849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inverse probability weighting in nested case-control studies with additional matching--a simulation study. Støer NC; Samuelsen SO Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5328-39. PubMed ID: 24132909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of Disease Risk Score Matching in Nested Case-Control Studies: A Simulation Study. Desai RJ; Glynn RJ; Wang S; Gagne JJ Am J Epidemiol; 2016 May; 183(10):949-57. PubMed ID: 27189330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Control-initiated case-control studies. Greenland S Int J Epidemiol; 1985 Mar; 14(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 3988428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The feasibility of matching and quota sampling in epidemiologic studies. Walter SD Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Aug; 130(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 2665478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selection of subjects for hospital-based epidemiologic studies based on outward manifestations of disease. Nishioka SA; Gyorkos TW; Joseph L; Collet JP Clin Invest Med; 2001 Dec; 24(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 11767233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]