These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 394711)
1. [Preliminary research on the scanning electron microscope. Note 2. Tooth-filling interface study]. Pierleoni P; Pasquinelli P Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1979; 20(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 394711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Preliminary research on the scanning electron microscope. Note 1. Filling materials study]. Pierleoni P; Pasquinelli P Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1978; 19(4):255-67. PubMed ID: 294879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations. Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Scanning electronmicroscopic studies on the behavior of so-called caustic-adhesive composite resins]. Triadan H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1975 Nov; 30(11):721-5. PubMed ID: 1104341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [SEM study of the cervical margins in composite restorations using bonding agents]. Seichter U Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Aug; 41(8):739-42. PubMed ID: 3533512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Margins of composite preparations, danger of secondary etching, scanning electron microscopy aspects]. Lamiable D Chir Dent Fr; 1986 Jan; 56(323):35-9. PubMed ID: 3519114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluations of the interface between amalgam and dentin with a single component dentin bonding system. Estafan D; Gultz J; Pines M; Scherer W Gen Dent; 2000; 48(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 11199580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations. Staninec M; Marshall GW; Lowe A; Ruzickova T Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preventive resin restorations: etching patterns, resin tag morphology and the enamel-resin interface. Hicks MJ ASDC J Dent Child; 1984; 51(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 6371082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Composite and amalgam fillings in a 4-year clinical comparison]. Hoyer I; Gängler P; Niemela S Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1988; 76(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 2975115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [S.E.M. analysis of the stages of preparation of a new composite for Class I and II restorations]. Sassone F; Leonardi L; Evangelisti A; Ruggeri A; Franchi M; Montanari G Dent Cadmos; 1986 Feb; 54(3):91-7. PubMed ID: 3525248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Composite resins as a dental restorative material. Johnson LN J Biomed Mater Res; 1971; 5(2):207-23. PubMed ID: 5575326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Observations made by the replica technique on adhesion of visible light-cured composite resins to cavities. Amano Y; Kouchi T; Katayama H; Kakinuma T; Takei T; Katayama T; Katayama I Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1986; 15(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 3524715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Amalgam filling before and after polishing: a scanning electron microscopic study]. Gharevi N Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981; 36(12):845-53. PubMed ID: 6947889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Scanning electron microscopy evaluation after 2 years of a posterior composite: a possible amalgam substitute?]. Pierleoni P; Pagavino G Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1984; 25(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 6599258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]