These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3947837)

  • 1. A detailed study of radiation dose and radiographic technique during chest radiography.
    Faulkner K; Gordon MD; Miller J
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Mar; 59(699):245-9. PubMed ID: 3947837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of radiographic technique for chest radiography.
    Warren-Forward HM; Millar JS
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 68(815):1221-9. PubMed ID: 8542230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A reduction in radiographic exposure and image quality in film screen postero-anterior chest radiography.
    Egbe NO; Egong EA; Ekpo EU; Inah GB
    Niger J Med; 2012; 21(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 23301442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.
    Archer BR; Whitmore RC; North LB; Bushong SC
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 472293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing radiation doses to the breast, thyroid and gonads during diagnostic radiography.
    Weatherburn GC
    Radiography; 1983 Jul; 49(583):151-6. PubMed ID: 6611892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs.
    Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose received by patients during barium meal investigations under automatic brightness control.
    Faulkner K; Bramall G
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jan; 58(685):31-4. PubMed ID: 4063640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria.
    Lanhede B; Båth M; Kheddache S; Sund P; Björneld L; Widell M; Almén A; Besjakov J; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Herrmann C; Panzer W; Zankl M; Månsson LG
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Jan; 75(889):38-49. PubMed ID: 11806957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
    Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
    Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neonatal chest and abdominal radiation dosimetry: a comparison of two radiographic techniques.
    Jones NF; Palarm TW; Negus IS
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):920-5. PubMed ID: 11675309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.