These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3948602)

  • 1. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic analysis of chromosomes. The use of reduced numerical patterns for computer karyotyping of chromosomes.
    Jagielski J; Noga L; Haus O
    Acta Med Pol; 1982; 23(3-4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7187607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual classification of banded human chromosomes. III. Classification and karyotyping of density profiles described by band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Granum E
    Clin Genet; 1979 May; 15(5):430-9. PubMed ID: 445866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Machine based chromosomes investigations with the Quantimet 720 (author's transl)].
    Malkusch W
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1977; (1):95-103. PubMed ID: 392260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between G band number and chromosome length from prophase to metaphase.
    Jagielski J; Haus O
    Acta Physiol Pol; 1983; 34(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6637533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chromosome banding analysis by slit-scan flow cytometry.
    Bartholdi MF; Meyne J; Johnston RG; Cram LS
    Cytometry; 1989 Mar; 10(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 2496955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic chromosome analysis. I. A simple method for classification of B- and D-group chromosomes represented by band transition sequences.
    Lundsteen C; Bjerregaard B; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K
    Clin Genet; 1980; 17(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 7363505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Studies of differentially stained metaphase chromosomes using scanning systems and computer technics].
    Saralidze EG; Ul'ianov NB; Kaminir LB
    Tsitologiia; 1983 Mar; 25(3):235-49. PubMed ID: 6344370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aspects of automated chromosome analysis. Different representations of banded human chromosomes and their cytogenetic evaluation.
    Lundsteen C
    Dan Med Bull; 1980 Feb; 27(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 6156802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A system for automatic metaphase finding and semi-automatic chromosome analysis.
    van den Berg HT; de France HF
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1979; (3):213-20. PubMed ID: 396455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical methods for classification of human chromosomes.
    Habbema JD
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 497330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Recent developments of instrument assisted chromosome analysis with Quantimet 720 (author's transl)].
    Malkusch W
    Microsc Acta Suppl; 1979; (3):221-8. PubMed ID: 396456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-assisted karyotyping system of banded chromosomes.
    Bruschi C; Tedeschi F; Puglisi PP; Marmiroli N
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1981; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 7460628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated chromosome analysis using the Magiscan Image Analyser.
    Graham J; Taylor CJ
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7469198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metaphase quality can be monitored by automatic counting of bands.
    Lundsteen C; Maahr J; Gerdes T
    Clin Genet; 1994 Feb; 45(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8004799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modular framework for the automatic classification of chromosomes in Q-band images.
    Poletti E; Grisan E; Ruggeri A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):120-30. PubMed ID: 21963236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.