These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3949514)

  • 1. Practical quantitation of radiation levels associated with newer CT scanner units.
    Jacobson A; Kelly MS
    Health Phys; 1986 Feb; 50(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 3949514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strategies and Scientific Basis of Dose Reduction on State-of-the-Art Multirow Detector X-Ray CT Systems.
    Karamat MI
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2015; 43(1):33-59. PubMed ID: 26351022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT equipment and performance issues: radiation protection 162.
    Edyvean S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23188810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
    Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient dosage in computed tomography.
    McCullough EC; Payne JT
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):457-63. PubMed ID: 704862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of patient exposure to X-radiation from SPECT/CT scanners.
    Hara N; Onoguchi M; Takenaka K; Matsubara K; Ujita H; Kenko Y
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2010 Sep; 38(3):138-48. PubMed ID: 20807855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed tomographic scanning in children: II. An updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial scanners.
    Brasch RC; Cann CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6976686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regional survey of image quality and radiation dose in computed tomography examinations in Saudi Arabia.
    Saeed MK; Alzoubi AS; Al-Qahtani JM
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Jun; 37(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 24609761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mathematical modeling of the radiation dose received from photons passing over and through shielding walls in a PET/CT suite.
    Fog LS; Cormack J
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):769-79. PubMed ID: 21068595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of computed tomography scanners in Taiwan: dose descriptors, dose guidance levels, and effective doses.
    Tsai HY; Tung CJ; Yu CC; Tyan YS
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1234-43. PubMed ID: 17500455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose associated with spiral computed tomography.
    McGhee PL; Humphreys S
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1994 Apr; 45(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 8149267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multislice scanners and radiation dose.
    Mahesh M; Hevezi JM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 19179243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dosimetry in conventional and spiral CT in 8 spiral CT scanners of the latest generation].
    Scheck RJ; Coppenrath EM; Kellner MW; Lehmann KJ; Mayer M; Rock C; Rieger J; Rothmeier L; Schweden F; Sokiranski R; Bäuml A; Hahn K
    Rofo; 1998 Jun; 168(6):562-6. PubMed ID: 9687947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT image quality over time: comparison of image quality for six different CT scanners over a six-year period.
    Roa AM; Andersen HK; Martinsen AC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 16(2):4972. PubMed ID: 26103172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose for routine clinical adult brain CT: Variability on different scanners at one institution.
    Jaffe TA; Hoang JK; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Lowry C; Ravin C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):433-8. PubMed ID: 20651201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers.
    Chen-Mayer HH; Fuld MK; Hoppel B; Judy PF; Sieren JP; Guo J; Lynch DA; Possolo A; Fain SB
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):974-985. PubMed ID: 28060414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT radiation dose and image quality.
    Payne JT
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2005 Nov; 43(6):953-62, vii. PubMed ID: 16253656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of skin exposure during cerebral CT perfusion studies on a phantom.
    Suzuki S; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Machida H; Takei R; Ibukuro K; Mehta D
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):851-5. PubMed ID: 20932701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners.
    Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.