74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3949540)
1. Comparing aggregate estimates of derived thresholds for clinical decisions.
Young MJ; Eisenberg JM; Williams SV; Hershey JC
Health Serv Res; 1986 Feb; 20(6 Pt 1):763-80. PubMed ID: 3949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Derived thresholds. Determining the diagnostic probabilities at which clinicians initiate testing and treatment.
Eisenberg JM; Hershey JC
Med Decis Making; 1983; 3(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 6415358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The threshold approach to clinical decision making.
Pauker SG; Kassirer JP
N Engl J Med; 1980 May; 302(20):1109-17. PubMed ID: 7366635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method to describe physician decision thresholds and its application in examining the diagnosis of coronary artery disease based on exercise treadmill testing.
Plasencia CM; Alderman BW; Barón AE; Rolfs RT; Boyko EJ
Med Decis Making; 1992; 12(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 1513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of clinicians' subjective prior probability estimates.
Dolan JG; Bordley DR; Mushlin AI
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 3773651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generating pre-test probabilities: a neglected area in clinical decision making.
Attia JR; Nair BR; Sibbritt DW; Ewald BD; Paget NS; Wellard RF; Patterson L; Heller RF
Med J Aust; 2004 May; 180(9):449-54. PubMed ID: 15115422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perspective: Uses and misuses of thresholds in diagnostic decision making.
Warner JL; Najarian RM; Tierney LM
Acad Med; 2010 Mar; 85(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 20182138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel approach to the determination of clinical decision thresholds.
Ebell MH; Locatelli I; Senn N
Evid Based Med; 2015 Apr; 20(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 25736042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Quantitative Study of Decision Thresholds for Initiation of Antibiotics in Suspected Sepsis.
Taylor SP; Weissman GE; Kowalkowski M; Admon AJ; Skewes S; Xia Y; Chou SH
Med Decis Making; 2023 Feb; 43(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 36062810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method for determining physician decision thresholds using empiric, uncertain recommendations.
Boland MV; Lehmann HP
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Apr; 10():20. PubMed ID: 20377882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical utility curve: a proposal to improve the translation of information provided by prediction models to clinicians.
Campbell DJ
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():219. PubMed ID: 27080381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stochastic thresholds.
Hartz A; McKinney WP; Centor R; Krieg A; Simms G; Henck S
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 3736375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of a rapid home test on telehealth decision-making for influenza: a clinical vignette study.
Cai X; Ebell MH; Geyer RE; Thompson M; Gentile NL; Lutz B
BMC Prim Care; 2022 Apr; 23(1):75. PubMed ID: 35418027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing stable angina. Expert opinion versus decision analysis.
Manu P; Runge LA
Med Care; 1985 Dec; 23(12):1381-90. PubMed ID: 4087952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probabilistic reporting of EUS-FNA cytology: Toward improved communication and better clinical decisions.
Eltoum IA; Chen VK; Chhieng DC; Jhala D; Jhala NC; Crowe R; Varadarajulu S; Eloubeidi MA
Cancer; 2006 Apr; 108(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 16444743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing clinicians' decisions to prescribe medication to prevent coronary heart disease.
Greenfield S; Bryan S; Gill P; Gutridge K; Marshall T
J Clin Pharm Ther; 2005 Feb; 30(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 15659007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic analysis of decision trees using symbolic algebra.
Willard KE; Critchfield GC
Med Decis Making; 1986; 6(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3702626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
Mills DM
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretation of diagnostic data: 6. How to do it with more complex maths.
Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Nov; 129(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 6627168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
