These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3949817)

  • 1. Fluid dynamic models as a guide to determine prosthetic heart valve diameter.
    Fumero R; Pietrabissa R
    J Biomech; 1986; 19(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 3949817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design of a system for the accelerated loading of heart valve prostheses.
    Rousseau EP; van de Ven AP; van Steenhoven AA; Seroo JM
    J Biomech; 1984; 17(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 6725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unsteady effects on the flow across tilting disk valves.
    Rosenfeld M; Avrahami I; Einav S
    J Biomech Eng; 2002 Feb; 124(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 11871601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
    Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer simulation: a diagnostic method in comparative studies of valve prostheses.
    Engelman MS; Moskowitz SE; Borman JB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Mar; 79(3):402-12. PubMed ID: 7354636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro evaluation of prosthetic heart valves: anomalies and limitations.
    Tindale WB; Black MM; Martin TR
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1982 May; 3(2):115-30. PubMed ID: 7116789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation in vitro of prosthetic heart valves: pulsatile flow through a compliant aorta.
    Tindale WB; Trowbridge EA
    Life Support Syst; 1983; 1(3):173-88. PubMed ID: 6679015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of eight prosthetic aortic valves in a cadaver model.
    Youdelman BA; Hirose H; Jain H; Kresh JY; Entwistle JW; Wechsler AS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 134(6):1526-32. PubMed ID: 18023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beat-rate dependent mitral flow patterns for in vitro hemodynamic applications.
    Vismara R; Fiore GB
    Int J Artif Organs; 2010 Dec; 33(12):868-76. PubMed ID: 21186468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
    Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Hemodynamic Performance of Aortic Valve Bioprostheses in a Model of Oversizing.
    Cleveland JD; Bowdish ME; Eberhardt CE; Mack WJ; Crabtree JA; Vassiliades TA; Speir AM; Darekar YA; Hackmann AE; Starnes VA; Cohen RG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jun; 103(6):1866-1876. PubMed ID: 28131425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel thoughts on patient-prosthesis mismatch in aortic valve replacement: the rationale for the PAR I trial.
    Doenst T; Amorim PA; Diab M; Hagendorff A; Faerber G; Graff J; Rastan A; Deutsch O; Eichinger W;
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 62(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 25136945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the mitral valve prosthesis adversely affect the hemodynamic performance of the aortic valve prosthesis in patients with double valve replacement?
    Spiliotopoulos K; Armstrong S; Maganti M; David TE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S74-7. PubMed ID: 22104672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pulsed Doppler echocardiography in prosthetic aortic and mitral valve replacement].
    Mattern H; Fricke G
    Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Jan; 64(2):76-85. PubMed ID: 3951167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the CarboMedics valve.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Davies GA; Spyt TJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1991 Oct; 52(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 1929635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the hydrodynamic function of the size 19mm and 21mm St. Jude Medical Hemodynamic Plus Bileaflet Heart valves.
    Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 8162222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.