These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3950197)

  • 1. Auditory sensitivity in preschool children.
    Schneider BA; Trehub SE; Morrongiello BA; Thorpe LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 3950197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory sensitivity in school-age children.
    Trehub SE; Schneider BA; Morrongiello BA; Thorpe LA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1988 Oct; 46(2):273-85. PubMed ID: 3171476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size of critical band in infants, children, and adults.
    Schneider BA; Morrongiello BA; Trehub SE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):642-52. PubMed ID: 2144577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developmental changes in masked thresholds.
    Schneider BA; Trehub SE; Morrongiello BA; Thorpe LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Nov; 86(5):1733-42. PubMed ID: 2808922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental changes in high-frequency sensitivity.
    Trehub SE; Schneider BA; Morrongiello BA; Thorpe LA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(5):241-9. PubMed ID: 2803110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency selectivity in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus) studied with narrow-band noise masking.
    Saunders JC; Bock GR; Fahrbach SE
    Sens Processes; 1978 Jun; 2(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 715471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].
    Schönweiler R; Neumann A; Ptok M
    HNO; 2005 Nov; 53(11):983-94. PubMed ID: 16283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous masking and unmasking with bandlimited noise.
    Lutfi RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):899-905. PubMed ID: 6841816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental perspectives on the localization and detection of auditory signals.
    Schneider BA; Trehub SE; Thorpe L
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 2011447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Grose JH; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27438873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz).
    Rosen S; Stock D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Aug; 92(2 Pt 1):773-81. PubMed ID: 1506531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inter-individual differences in binaural detection of low-frequency or high-frequency tonal signals masked by narrow-band or broadband noise.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Hyde EL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2069-78. PubMed ID: 9566329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria.
    Beahan N; Kei J; Driscoll C; Charles B; Khan A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral modulation masking patterns reveal tuning to spectral envelope frequency.
    Saoji AA; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1004-13. PubMed ID: 17672648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The masking of octave-band noise by broad-spectrum noise: a comparison of infant and adult thresholds.
    Bull D; Schneider BA; Trehub SE
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Aug; 30(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 7301508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tactile sensitivity of children: effects of frequency, masking, and the non-Pacinian I psychophysical channel.
    Güçlü B; Oztek C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Oct; 98(2):113-30. PubMed ID: 17597140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss.
    Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and test frequency.
    Haggard MP; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 2380439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The processing of envelope information in comodulation masking release (CMR) and envelope discrimination.
    Fantini DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1876-88. PubMed ID: 1960281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.