These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3950205)

  • 1. Log-linear modeling of consonant confusion data.
    Bell TS; Dirks DD; Levitt H; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):518-25. PubMed ID: 3950205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactive factors in consonant confusion patterns.
    Bell TS; Dirks DD; Carterette EC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):339-46. PubMed ID: 2921416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consonant confusions in white noise.
    Phatak SA; Lovitt A; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1220-33. PubMed ID: 18681609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.
    Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ; Ua Cruadhlaoich MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of high presentation levels on consonant feature transmission.
    Hornsby BW; Trine TD; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1719-29. PubMed ID: 16240830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.
    Dubno JR; Levitt H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 7217523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of vowel duration as a cue for the voicing distinction in the following word-final consonant.
    Hogan JT; Rozsypal AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 May; 67(5):1764-71. PubMed ID: 7372932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral and duration properties of front vowels as cues to final stop-consonant voicing.
    Fischer RM; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1250-9. PubMed ID: 2229662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants.
    Doyle KJ; Mills D; Larky J; Kessler D; Luxford WM; Schindler RA
    Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 8588676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
    Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audio-visual identification of place of articulation and voicing in white and babble noise.
    Alm M; Behne DM; Wang Y; Eg R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):377-87. PubMed ID: 19603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2005-26. PubMed ID: 8227744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of speech processed by low-pass filtering and pitch-invariant frequency lowering.
    Reed CM; Hicks BL; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Aug; 74(2):409-19. PubMed ID: 6619418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.
    Benkí JR
    Phonetica; 2003; 60(2):129-57. PubMed ID: 12853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Importance of temporal-envelope cues in consonant recognition.
    van der Horst R; Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1801-9. PubMed ID: 10089603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Across- and within-consonant errors for isolated syllables in noise.
    Toscano JC; Allen JB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2293-307. PubMed ID: 25087617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD; Gamble T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1639-52. PubMed ID: 2708680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.