These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3950205)

  • 21. A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: application for consonant /t/.
    Régnier MS; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2801-14. PubMed ID: 18529196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discrete representation of perceptual structure underlying consonant confusions.
    Soli SD; Arabie P; Carroll JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):826-37. PubMed ID: 3958325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What should be implemented in future cochlear implants?
    Tyler RS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():268-75. PubMed ID: 2356735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic properties and perception of stop consonant release transients.
    Repp BH; Lin HB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):379-96. PubMed ID: 2921420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1599-607. PubMed ID: 3794065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conflicting and cooperating cues: perception of cues to final consonant voicing by infants and adults.
    Eilers R; Oller DK; Urbano R; Moroff D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 2739382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory versus phonetic accounts of observed confusions between consonant phonemes.
    Soli SD; Arabie P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Jul; 66(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 489832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies.
    Donaldson GS; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consonant perception by normals in conditions of filtering.
    Danhauer JL
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978; 4(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 299590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels.
    Jenkins JJ; Strange W; Trent SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):438-48. PubMed ID: 10420634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment.
    Smits R; ten Bosch L; Collier R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3852-64. PubMed ID: 8969486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sources of Variability in Consonant Perception and Implications for Speech Perception Modeling.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():437-446. PubMed ID: 27080685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic correlates of the front/back vowel distinction: a comparison of transition onset versus "steady state".
    Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 2380450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiband product rule and consonant identification.
    Li F; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):347-53. PubMed ID: 19603891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enhancing speech envelope by integrating hair-cell adaptation into cochlear implant processing.
    Azadpour M; Smith RL
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():48-57. PubMed ID: 27697486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.
    Stevens KN; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1358-68. PubMed ID: 744836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults.
    Ohde RN; Abou-Khalil R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2156-66. PubMed ID: 11681392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phonetic perception: evidence for context-dependent and context-independent processing.
    Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):822-31. PubMed ID: 7240563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
    Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.