These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3951118)
1. The 'Baby Doe' rule. Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The second Baby Doe rule. Kopelman LM JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(6):843-4. PubMed ID: 3336197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life. Goldworth A; Stevenson DK Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legal response to Babies Doe: an analytical prognosis. Rosenblum VG; Grant ER Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 3636287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change. Weil WB Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 3700073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe. Paige C; Karnofsky EB J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict. Berseth CL Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Baby Doe rule: still a threat. Moskop JC; Saldanha RL Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):8-14. PubMed ID: 3700081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL Med World News; 1984 Apr; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical discrimination against children with disabilities: a report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Shapiro RS Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 2149131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary. Tucker BP Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Baby Doe regulations: governmental intervention in neonatal rescue medicine. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 6232863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The federal role in protecting Babies Doe. Gerry MH; Nimz M Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):339-77. PubMed ID: 2954927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns. Reiser SJ J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]