These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3951208)

  • 21. Cineradiographic assessment of Björk-Shiley aortic and mitral prosthetic heart valves.
    Godwin RJ
    Clin Radiol; 1977 Jul; 28(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 872501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study in patients with Omnicarbon and Björk-Shiley heart valve replacement.
    Otaki M
    Int Surg; 1993; 78(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 8175264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mitral valve replacement. A comparative clinical and haemodynamic study of the new Lillehei-Kaster and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Nitter-Hauge S; Hall KV; Froysaker T
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977; 11(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 897617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Isolated mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. A six-year review and a comparison between the Delrin and the pyrolytic carbon disc models.
    Björk VO; Henze A
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977; 11(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 74091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Velocity of closure of Björk-Shiley Convexo-Concave mitral valves: effect of mitral annulus orientation and rate of left ventricular pressure rise.
    Blick EF; Wieting DW; Inderbitzen R; Schreck S; Stein PD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S26-30; discussion S30-1. PubMed ID: 8581208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative flow study of the Omniscience and the Björk-Shiley cardiac valve prostheses.
    Reif TH; Huffstutler MC
    Int J Artif Organs; 1984 Sep; 7(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 6500735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The central flow tilting disc valve prosthesis (Björk-Shiley) for mitral valve replacement.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1970; 4(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 4912799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of Björk-Shiley prosthetic valves by real-time two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic flow mapping.
    Dittrich H; Nicod P; Hoit B; Dalton N; Sahn D
    Am Heart J; 1988 Jan; 115(1 Pt 1):133-8. PubMed ID: 3336968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Hemodynamics after mitral valve replacement with Starr-Edwards, Björk-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster protheses (author's transl)].
    Haerten K; Both A; Lück J; Herzer J; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1977 May; 66(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 878552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
    Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cineradiographic evaluation of the convexo-concave Björk-Shiley prosthetic valve in mitral position.
    Ishimaru S; Furuawka K; Takahashi M
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983; 17(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 6648396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of normal and thrombosed Björk-Shiley mitral prosthetic valves.
    Radhakrishnan S; Behl VK; Bajaj R; Bhatia ML; Shrivastava S
    Int J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 20(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 3170040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
    Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Björk-Shiley prosthetic values.
    Sagar KB; Wann LS; Paulsen WH; Romhilt DW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 3950245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prophylactic replacement of Björk-Shiley convexo-concave valves at risk of strut fracture. Björk-Shiley Study Group.
    Kallewaard M; Algra A; Defauw J; van der Graaf Y
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Mar; 115(3):577-81; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 9535445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position.
    Kaul TK; Mercer JL
    Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
    Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The optimal opening angle of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Björk VO
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981; 15(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 7347890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.