These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3953715)

  • 1. Microbial colonization of tailed and tailless intrauterine contraceptive devices: influence of the mode of insertion in the rabbit.
    Jacques M; Olson ME; Costerton JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 154(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 3953715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacteriological colonisation of uterine cavity: role of tailed intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Sparks RA; Purrier BG; Watt PJ; Elstein M
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Apr; 282(6271):1189-91. PubMed ID: 6788128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of the surfaces of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Marrie TJ; Costerton JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 6859159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A possible role for granulocytes in the action of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Parr EL; Schaedler RW; Hirsch JG
    Trans Assoc Am Physicians; 1967; 80():123-32. PubMed ID: 6082236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative transcervical uterine cultures in asymptomatic women using an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Hill JA; Talledo E; Steele J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 3531939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uterine contamination in the guinea pig following transcervical uterine monofilament insertion.
    Gard PR; Malhi JS; Hanlon GW
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1993; 35(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8449434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of chlorhexidine-releasing nylon fibres to reduce device-related uterine infections.
    Gard PR; Reynolds JP; Hanlon GW
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 49(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 10828710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Possibility of infectious complications after insertion of intrauterine contraceptives].
    Libenzon LL; Kholodovskaya IV
    Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1971 May; 16(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 5142498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron and confocal scanning laser microscopy imaging of the ultrastructure and viability of vaginal Candida albicans and non- albicans species adhered to an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Paiva LC; Donatti L; Patussi EV; Svizdinski TI; Lopes-Consolaro ME
    Microsc Microanal; 2010 Oct; 16(5):537-49. PubMed ID: 20804637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scanning electron microscopy of Dalkon Shield tails.
    Bank HL; Williamson HO
    Fertil Steril; 1983 Sep; 40(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 6884535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of a copper intra-uterine contraceptive device on the microbial ecology of the female genital tract.
    Elhag KM; Bahar AM; Mubarak AA
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Apr; 25(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 3357191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ON THE CYTOLOGICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL STUDIES AFTER LONG-INSERTION OF INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE(IUD).
    ISHIHAMA A; KAGABU T
    Yokohama Med Bull; 1964 Oct; 15():201-5. PubMed ID: 14284144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface changes in intrauterine contraceptive devices after variable use.
    Keith L; Bailey R; Berger GS; Method M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 152(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 3993713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial flora of the vagina and cervix.
    Corbishley CM
    J Clin Pathol; 1977 Aug; 30(8):745-8. PubMed ID: 340474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study to determine the effect of Betadine Vaginal Cleansing Kit on cervical flora after insertion of an intra-uterine contraceptive device.
    Obaidullah M
    J Int Med Res; 1981; 9(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 7238993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mechanism of action of the copper intrauterine device.
    Tamaya T; Nakata Y; Ohno Y; Nioka S; Furuta N
    Fertil Steril; 1976 Jul; 27(7):767-72. PubMed ID: 181276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of intrauterine contraceptive devices on the ultrastructure of the endometrium in relation to bleeding complications.
    Sheppard BL; Bonnar J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 146(7):829-39. PubMed ID: 6869454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contraception using intrauterine devices. Indications, contra-indications, risks].
    Blanc B
    Rev Prat; 1989 Oct; 39(23):2083-7. PubMed ID: 2814281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intrauterine contraceptive devices. Mode of action, experiences, complications (author's transl)].
    Ludwig H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Feb; 36(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 943359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.