These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3954273)

  • 1. Complications of the Angelchik prosthesis in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Kauten JR; Mansour KA
    Am Surg; 1986 Apr; 52(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 3954273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intractable dysphagia following placement of Angelchik prosthesis for reflux esophagitis.
    Battaglini JW; Schorlemmer GR; Frantz PT
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 May; 35(5):551-2. PubMed ID: 6847293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the management of failed Angelchik prosthesis.
    Jalil O; Zia MK; Hassn A; Morcous P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011; 21(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 21190477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Cohen D; Motaparthy V; Castell DO
    Ann Intern Med; 1984 Apr; 100(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 6367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis and postoperative dysphagia.
    Leguit P; Hagen WB; Laarman J
    Neth J Surg; 1987 Jun; 39(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 3614751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis. A community experience.
    Smith RS; Chang FC; Hayes KA; deBakker J
    Am J Surg; 1985 Dec; 150(6):735-8. PubMed ID: 4073367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Deakin M; Mayer D; Temple JG
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jul; 71(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 2774454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux.
    Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective study of the Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis.
    Wale RJ; Royston CM; Bennett JR; Buckton GK
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 4016530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospective randomized trial of Nissen fundoplication and Angelchik prosthesis in the surgical treatment of medically refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
    Kmiot WA; Kirby RM; Akinola D; Temple JG
    Br J Surg; 1991 Oct; 78(10):1181-4. PubMed ID: 1958979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reoperation for complications of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis.
    Stewart KC; Urschel JD; Hallgren RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Jun; 57(6):1557-8. PubMed ID: 8010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis: long-term clinical and technical follow-up.
    Thibault C; Marceau P; Biron S; Bourque RA; Béland L; Potvin M
    Can J Surg; 1994 Feb; 37(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 8306213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Angelchik anti-reflux device: radiographic appearance of complications.
    Curtis DJ; Benjamin SB; Kerr R; Castell DO
    Radiology; 1984 May; 151(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 6424173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Angelchik anti-reflux prosthesis--some reservations.
    Durrans D; Armstrong CP; Taylor TV
    Br J Surg; 1985 Jul; 72(7):525-7. PubMed ID: 4016531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic management of intragastric migration of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Cullingford GL; Coffey JF; Carr-Locke DL
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Nov; 60(11):913-7. PubMed ID: 2241654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis.
    Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of the Angelchik prosthesis on esophageal and gastric function.
    Maddern GJ; Myers JC; McIntosh N; Bridgewater FH; Jamieson GG
    Arch Surg; 1991 Nov; 126(11):1418-22. PubMed ID: 1747057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic removal of an Angelchik prosthesis.
    Underwood RA; Weinstock LB; Soper NJ; Quasebarth MA; Brunt LM
    Surg Endosc; 1999 Jun; 13(6):615-7. PubMed ID: 10347303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective randomized trial of angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication.
    Stuart RC; Dawson K; Keeling P; Byrne PJ; Hennessy TP
    Br J Surg; 1989 Jan; 76(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 2645016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis.
    Wyllie JH; Edwards DA
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 4037629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.