These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3954679)

  • 1. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions.
    Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Two Circumaural Earphones for Audiometry.
    Smull CC; Madsen B; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):177-183. PubMed ID: 29742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of Békésy sweep audiometry recording and effects of the earphone position.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1980; 366():99-112. PubMed ID: 6255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaural attenuation for Sennheiser HDA 200 circumaural earphones.
    Brännström KJ; Lantz J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):467-71. PubMed ID: 20482294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equivalent threshold sound pressure levels (ETSPL) for Sennheiser HDA 280 supra-aural audiometric earphones in the frequency range 125 Hz to 8000 Hz.
    Poulsen T; Oakley S
    Int J Audiol; 2009 May; 48(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 19842802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.
    Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
    Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency threshold measurements using insert earphones.
    Tang H; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):378-9. PubMed ID: 1487097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
    Frank T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AMTAS(®): automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps.
    Margolis RH; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):440-7. PubMed ID: 21668325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the variability in thresholds measured with insert and conventional supra-aural earphones.
    Lindgren F
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2336535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of the type of acoustic transducer in pure-tone audiometry.
    Born NM; Marciano MDS; Mass SDC; Silva DPCD; Scharlach RC
    Codas; 2022; 34(3):e20210019. PubMed ID: 35019084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.