187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3955973)
1. Comparison of lumbosacral fixation devices.
Ogilvie JW; Schendel M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):120-5. PubMed ID: 3955973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumbosacral fusions with Harrington rods and intersegmental wiring.
White AH; Zucherman JF; Hsu K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):185-90. PubMed ID: 3955981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of the lumbar spine and method of instrumentation.
Vanden Berghe L; Mehdian H; Lee AJ; Weatherley CR
Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 8372653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Galveston technique using Luque or Cotrel-Dubousset rods.
Lonstein JE
Orthop Clin North Am; 1994 Apr; 25(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 8159404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Internal fixation in lumbosacral spine fusion. A biomechanical and clinical study.
Kornblatt MD; Casey MP; Jacobs RR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):141-50. PubMed ID: 2937592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical testing of a novel four-rod technique for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction.
Kelly BP; Shen FH; Schwab JS; Arlet V; Diangelo DJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(13):E400-6. PubMed ID: 18520925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation.
Early S; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):1396-401. PubMed ID: 15959368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
Bruner HJ; Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Slivka MA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 21121756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of sacral buttress technique in Ramathibodi spinal system fixation on L5-S1 motion.
Wattanawong T; Laohacharoensombat W; Wajanavisit W; Channoom T; Woratanarat P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Oct; 84 Suppl 2():S495-8. PubMed ID: 11853270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmental spinal instrumentation in the management of scoliosis.
Steinmetz MP; Rajpal S; Trost G
Neurosurgery; 2008 Sep; 63(3 Suppl):131-8. PubMed ID: 18812915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.
Chen SH; Mo Lin R; Chen HH; Tsai KJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Mar; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17349057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of posterior instrumentation on axial rotation of the lumbar spine: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Gunzburg R; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord; 1995 Apr; 8(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 7606115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of sacral decortication on lumbosacral fixation in a calf spine model.
Thomas A; Kepler CK; Meyers K; Green DW; Wright TM; Rawlins BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):E388-92. PubMed ID: 21270709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
