227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3956001)
1. A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine.
Zindrick MR; Wiltse LL; Widell EH; Thomas JC; Holland WR; Field BT; Spencer CW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Feb; (203):99-112. PubMed ID: 3956001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
Yu B; Zhuang X; Li Z; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation.
Kiner DW; Wybo CD; Sterba W; Yeni YN; Bartol SW; Vaidya R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2618-22. PubMed ID: 19011543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loosening of sacral screw fixation under in vitro fatigue loading.
Lu WW; Zhu Q; Holmes AD; Luk KD; Zhong S; Leong JC
J Orthop Res; 2000 Sep; 18(5):808-14. PubMed ID: 11117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which is the preferred revision technique for loosened iliac screw? A novel technique of boring cement injection from the outer cortical shell.
Yu BS; Yang ZK; Li ZM; Zeng LW; Wang LB; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Aug; 24(6):E49-56. PubMed ID: 21685804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of 4 fixation techniques of sacral pedicle screw in osteoporotic condition.
Yu BS; Zhuang XM; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Li ZM; Lu WW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 20087222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biomechanical effect of the iliac screw insertion depth on lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
Chen H; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Lü Y; Zhang KB; Liu H; Li FB
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 46(15):1179-82. PubMed ID: 19094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.
Chen SH; Mo Lin R; Chen HH; Tsai KJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Mar; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17349057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anterior fixation in the osteoporotic spine: cut-out and pullout characteristics of implants.
Ferguson SJ; Winkler F; Nolte LP
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 12522709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods].
Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15860148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stress relaxation of bone significantly affects the pull-out behavior of pedicle screws.
Inceoglu S; McLain RF; Cayli S; Kilincer C; Ferrara L
J Orthop Res; 2004 Nov; 22(6):1243-7. PubMed ID: 15475204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation.
Luk KD; Chen L; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 15738784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
