These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Avoidance of artifacts on computerized tomograms by selection of appropriate surgical clips. Weese JL; Rosenthal MS; Gould H Am J Surg; 1984 May; 147(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 6372530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The problem of metal clip artefacts in computerized tomography]. Vock P; Aeberhard P; Schneekloth G Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Apr; 112(16):561-7. PubMed ID: 7079695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic field effects on surgical ligation clips. Brown MA; Carden JA; Coleman RE; McKinney R; Spicer LD Magn Reson Imaging; 1987; 5(6):443-53. PubMed ID: 3431354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters. Burtscher IM; Owman T; Romner B; Ståhlberg F; Holtås S Acta Radiol; 1998 Jan; 39(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 9498874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation. Wang JC; Yu WD; Sandhu HS; Tam V; Delamarter RB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 9704376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical ligation clip artifacts on CT scans. Gross SC; Kowalski JB; Lee SH; Terry B; Honickman SJ Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):831-2. PubMed ID: 4023253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Black hole artifacts-a new potential pitfall for DXA accuracy? Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Fineberg N; Tubbs RS; Yester MV J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 18291695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. van der Schaaf I; van Leeuwen M; Vlassenbroek A; Velthuis B AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 16418357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning. Sullivan PK; Smith JF; Rozzelle AA Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Oct; 94(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 7938281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium. Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An anthropomorphic phantom study of visualisation of surgical clips for partial breast irradiation (PBI) setup verification. Thomas CW; Nichol AM; Park JE; Hui JF; Giddings AA; Grahame S; Otto K Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jan; 90(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 18417232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants. Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials. Schildhauer TA; Robie B; Muhr G; Köller M J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Jul; 20(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 16891939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing computed tomography to reduce artifacts from titanium aneurysm clips: an in vitro study. Technical note. Mamourian AC; Pluta DJ; Eskey CJ; Merlis AL J Neurosurg; 2007 Dec; 107(6):1238-43. PubMed ID: 18077966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine. Levi AD; Choi WG; Keller PJ; Heiserman JE; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]