BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3956233)

  • 1. Electron microscopic features of never-worn soft contact lenses: deposits or artifacts?
    Deg JK; Binder PS
    Curr Eye Res; 1986 Jan; 5(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 3956233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
    Fowler SA; Gaertner KL
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning electron microscopy, X-ray microanalysis and immunohistochemistry on worn soft contact lenses.
    Versura P; Maltarello MC; Roomans GM; Caramazza R; Laschi R
    Scanning Microsc; 1988 Mar; 2(1):397-410. PubMed ID: 3285461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft contact lenses from patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis.
    Fowler SA; Greiner JV; Allansmith MR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Dec; 88(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 517610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of soft contact lens coatings.
    Fowler SA; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Jan; 98(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 7352873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of cleaning soft contact lenses. A scanning electron microscopic study.
    Fowler SA; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Aug; 99(8):1382-6. PubMed ID: 7259611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface deposits on frequent replacement and conventional daily wear soft contact lenses: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ilhan B; Irkec M; Orhan M; Celik H
    CLAO J; 1998 Oct; 24(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 9800063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of proteins in contact lens surface deposits by immunofluorescence microscopy.
    Gudmundsson OG; Woodward DF; Fowler SA; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1985 Feb; 103(2):196-7. PubMed ID: 3883966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel quantitative evaluation of deposits adhered to worn orthokeratology contact lenses.
    Hiraoka T; Yoshimitsu M; Santodomingo-Rubido J; Kondo H; Oshika T
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2021 Nov; 65(6):855-863. PubMed ID: 34586527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The evaluation of surface deposits on frequent replacement lenses by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)].
    KaƂuzny JJ; Szatkowski J
    Klin Oczna; 1998; 100(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 9884530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM).
    Bhatia S; Goldberg EP; Enns JB
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 9348451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface deposits on worn hard contact lenses.
    Fowler SA; Korb DR; Finnemore VM; Allansmith MR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1984 May; 102(5):757-9. PubMed ID: 6721770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury.
    Goldberg EP; Bhatia S; Enns JB
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9348448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of surface deposits on high water content hydrogel contact lens polymers.
    Tomlinson A; Caroline P
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 2347075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scanning electron microscopic characteristics of manually loaded and preloaded foldable acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Rateb MF; Eldaly ZH; Ibrahim WSE; Eldoghaimy AH
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29619847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deposits on soft contact lenses. Electrophoresis and scanning electron microscopic examinations.
    Bilbaut T; Gachon AM; Dastugue B
    Exp Eye Res; 1986 Aug; 43(2):153-65. PubMed ID: 3758215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining the physiologically normal coating and pathological deposit: an analysis of sulfur-containing moieties and pellicle thickness on hydrogel contact lenses.
    Hart DE; Plociniak MP; Grimes GW
    CLAO J; 1998 Apr; 24(2):85-101. PubMed ID: 9571268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fungal growth on soft contact lenses: a SEM-study.
    Jongebloed WL; Humalda D; Worst JF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987; 67(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 3428091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microwave irradiation and soft contact lens parameters.
    Harris MG; Gan CM; Grant T; Lycho T; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Oct; 70(10):843-8. PubMed ID: 8247488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.