These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3958119)

  • 1. Selection bias in epidemiological studies of screening participants.
    Heuch I; Kvåle G
    J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 3958119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical power in breast cancer screening trials and mortality reduction among women 40-49 years of age with particular emphasis on the National Breast Screening Study of Canada.
    Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
    Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1196-203. PubMed ID: 8055437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usefulness of statistical models to assess the benefit of breast cancer screening: a reply.
    Eddy DM
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1980 Jun; 64(6):1277. PubMed ID: 6929367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefits of screening for breast cancer: application of a probabilistic model to a breast cancer detection project.
    Dubin N
    J Chronic Dis; 1979; 32(1-2):145-51. PubMed ID: 447774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimates of lead time and length bias in a breast cancer screening program.
    Shwartz M
    Cancer; 1980 Aug; 46(4):844-51. PubMed ID: 7397650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of screening methods in the detection of breast cancer].
    Semiglazov VF
    Vopr Onkol; 1985; 31(4):92-6. PubMed ID: 4002676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biases in the assessment of colorectal cancer screening programmes using hemoccult.
    Dickinson JA
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1982 Dec; 52(6):622-5. PubMed ID: 6962733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re: All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.
    Kopans DB; Halpern E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Jun; 94(11):863; author reply 865-6. PubMed ID: 12048280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The case-control design and the assessment of the efficacy of cancer screening.
    Connor RJ; Prorok PC; Weed DL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(11):1215-21. PubMed ID: 1941016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pitfalls in using case-control studies for the evaluation of the effectiveness of breast screening programmes.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2013 Sep; 22(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 23263568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer of the breast and breast-feeding. Study of 279 parous women and matched controls.
    Abou-Daoud KT
    Cancer; 1971 Sep; 28(3):781-4. PubMed ID: 5096938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective epidemiological studies involving paired organs.
    Whitehead J; Dorse C
    Stat Med; 1988 May; 7(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 3387720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Failure of selective screening for breast cancer by combining risk factors.
    Soini I; Hakama M
    Int J Cancer; 1978 Sep; 22(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 700891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Natural history of minimal and occult breast cancers. Long term survival and mass screening].
    Couray J
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Nov; 87(11):548-60. PubMed ID: 1480925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A case-control evaluation of the effect of breast cancer screening in the United Kingdom trial of early detection of breast cancer.
    Moss SM; Summerley ME; Thomas BT; Ellman R; Chamberlain JO
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Aug; 46(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 1431707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matched and unmatched: a comparison of two designs, with epidermiologic data.
    Currie JB
    Am J Epidemiol; 1971 May; 93(5):315-6. PubMed ID: 5556394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of potential biases on the risk of breast tumors among women who received radiotherapy for acute postpartum mastitis.
    Prince MM; Hildreth NG
    J Chronic Dis; 1986; 39(7):553-60. PubMed ID: 3722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Breast cancer and pregnancy].
    Scholz A; Scholz C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1971 Jan; 93(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 4102672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level.
    Duffy SW; Smith RA; Tabar L
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Nov; 97(22):1703; author reply 1703-4. PubMed ID: 16288125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the benefits and harms of screening for breast cancer.
    Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 33(1):56-64; discussion 69-73. PubMed ID: 15075145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.