These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3958316)

  • 1. Absolute intensity discrimination using two responses.
    Green DM; von Gierke SM; Hanna TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):760-6. PubMed ID: 3958316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation.
    Nelson DA; Schmitz JL; Donaldson GS; Viemeister NF; Javel E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2393-414. PubMed ID: 8865646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of a change heuristic in judgments of sound intensity.
    Leboe LC; Mondor TA
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 20178937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of intensity and location on sound location discrimination in macaque monkeys.
    Recanzone GH; Beckerman NS
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):116-24. PubMed ID: 15567608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.
    Javel E; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):908-21. PubMed ID: 10687700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and intensity discrimination of a sinusoid.
    Hanna TE; von Gierke SM; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1335-40. PubMed ID: 3782610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric functions for level discrimination.
    Buus S; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1371-80. PubMed ID: 1939901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).
    Manohar S; Spoth J; Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Salvi R
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():197-203. PubMed ID: 28705607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal integration of loudness as a function of level.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Mar; 99(3):1633-44. PubMed ID: 8819858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.
    Viemeister NF; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 3411045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual overestimation of rising intensity: is stimulus continuity necessary?
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ
    Perception; 2010; 39(5):695-704. PubMed ID: 20677706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity perception. X. Effect of preceding stimulus on identification performance.
    Purks SR; Callahan DJ; Braida LD; Durlach NI
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Feb; 67(2):634-7. PubMed ID: 7358903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where the action is: Weber fractions as a function of sound pressure at low frequencies.
    Ward LM; Davidson KP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2587-94. PubMed ID: 8270736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.
    Brungart DS; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):425-40. PubMed ID: 11508968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination.
    Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2127-32. PubMed ID: 7963026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of silent gaps on temporal weights in loudness judgments.
    Fischenich A; Hots J; Verhey JL; Oberfeld D
    Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 395():108028. PubMed ID: 32693189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.